- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 10:20:15 -0700
- To: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
- Cc: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>, IƱaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>, Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>, "Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)" <matthew.kaufman@skype.net>, "<rtcweb@ietf.org>" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
On 19 July 2013 10:07, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> wrote: > Even if you have the same javascript application downloaded, you will have > disparate capabilities in the environments into which it is downloaded > (browser/os/codecs/media sources/available network capacity). Getting set > intersection and preference order for those capabilities is something that > applications actually want. You may be able to move the pain of that > around, but it isn't a waste of time. There's a vast difference between "it needs to be done" and "we need to define a standard for it". I have nothing against providing tools that make it easier, but it's a real leap of logic to conclude that the one and only mechanism for interaction *requires* negotiation and that SDP O/A is *the* negotiation method.
Received on Friday, 19 July 2013 17:20:42 UTC