W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > July 2013

Re: Audio and Opus configurability for speed and quality (at the expense of bandwidth)

From: Lonce Wyse <lonce.wyse@zwhome.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 21:15:02 +0800
Message-ID: <51F124D6.8080504@zwhome.org>
To: tim panton <thp@westhawk.co.uk>
CC: public-webrtc@w3.org

Hello,
     Thanks for responding to my questions.
     I appreciate not wanting to give web app developers enough rope to 
hang themselves with, but with the combination of the Web Audio API and 
Web RTC, the browser is on the verge of becoming a platform for serious 
highest-quality music production.  However, without being able to bypass 
the compression (saving critical milliseconds of delay) or turn off 
AGC,  its potential for concert-quality music making simply won't be 
realized.
     The number of people with something at stake here is relatively 
small, but not negligible. As I mentioned, we have other tools at our 
disposal such as JackTrip, but the benefits that come with working in 
the browser would be fantastic.

Best,
             - lonce



On 7/25/2013 4:17 PM, tim panton wrote:
> When we started discussing the constraints API - this was an issue 
> that came up,
> you would be able to mark an audio stream as 'for live music' and the 
> codec params
> would be set accordingly. (low latency, high quality, no voice 
> enhancement).
>
> Even though we have settled on Opus I think it would be a bad plan to 
> expose the
> codec specific 'knobs'. Better to allow the developer to express their 
> needs in more
> generic terms and have the browser interpret those needs in the 
> context of the codec.
> (heck, it might decide to do lin16 at 48khz !)
>
> T.
>
> On 14 Jun 2013, at 08:41, lonce <lonce.wyse@zwhome.org 
> <mailto:lonce.wyse@zwhome.org>> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hello -
>>
>>     I have a couple of questions I have not been able to answer 
>> myself after looking over published docs. I am interested in maximum 
>> speed and uncompromised quality transmission (for musical purposes), 
>> which leads to these questions:
>>
>> 1) What exactly is the strategy of the "components to conceal packet 
>> loss".  Is there a strategy specifically for audio packet loss?
>>
>> 2) Can the audio echo cancellation (AEC), automatic gain control 
>> (AGC), and noise reduction, be turned off (not used)?
>>
>> 3) Can compression by turned off completely (to avoid the algorithmic 
>> delay of coding/endcoding)?
>>
>> 4)  If you cannot bypass the compression algorithm, what is the 
>> minimum delay one can achieve?  It appears to me (from 
>> http://www.webrtc.org/reference/architecture and 
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opus_%28codec%29 ) that analysis frame 
>> sizes down to 2.5ms (CELT layer) and 10ms (SILK layer) are possible. 
>> This, in addition to "look ahead"  and algorithm delay puts the 
>> minimum delay at at least 20 ms, right?
>>
>> 5) Does one have control over how many analysis frames are sent per 
>> packet (could I set it to 1)?
>>
>> Musicians have been using a system called JackTrip (CCRMA, Stanford 
>> University) which suuports uncompressed transmission, and 
>> sub-millisecond frames (and packet) size. To recover from UDP losses, 
>> it sends redundant streams, and the receiver takes the first packet 
>> that arrives with the time stamp it needs next to reconstruct the 
>> audio on the receiver. My questions above are all about how close 
>> WebRTC can come to achieving the same performance.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>                  - lonce
>
Received on Thursday, 25 July 2013 13:16:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:35 UTC