W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > July 2013

Re: [rtcweb] On babies and bathwater (was Re: Summary of Application Developers' opinions of the current WebRTC API and SDP as a control surface)

From: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 11:56:48 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJrXDUE-yuq5CXNby=asabDint1tvHJ-yet=mbbe32R4qnsC2Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Cc: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>, "<rtcweb@ietf.org>" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> wrote:

> On 7/19/13 12:39, Peter Thatcher wrote:
>
>>
>> So, are you trying to say "Look how hard this is to do with SDP.  We're
>> not even done yet.  It will be even harder without SDP"?
>>
>>
> No. I'm not saying it would be harder. I'm saying it wouldn't be easier,



It wouldn't be harder, and it wouldn't be easier.  So, it would be about
the same amount of work for either?



> and you would lose tangible benefits.


I still don't understand how this could be true.  If we define an API that
allows JS to use either SDP or not, at its choice, how is that a loss?  It
seems like only a gain.






> /a
>
Received on Friday, 19 July 2013 18:57:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:35 UTC