Re: On babies and bathwater (was Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' opinions of the current WebRTC API and SDP as a control surface) from Iñaki Baz Castillo on 2013-07-20 (public-webrtc@w3.org from July 2013)

From: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 16:03:56 +0200
To: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>
Cc: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>, "Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)" <matthew.kaufman@skype.net>, "<rtcweb@ietf.org>" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CALiegf=BPjQqd5cdagvm3ZsBYizxOmA8HfRF=n8pV5YkQzPU9Q@mail.gmail.com>

2013/7/20 Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>:
> It's not true when a browser from one vendor running an application from a scone vendor needs to talk to video conferencing system from a third vendor.

In the WWW, the servide provider provides both the server side (in
this case the Web and the video conference server) and the client side
(the JS). Your concern is good for a SIP phone but not for a browser
nor for a JS custom application controlled and designed by the
provider.


--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>

Received on Saturday, 20 July 2013 14:04:42 UTC