It's certainly much better than useless in Firefox. https://developer.mozilla.org/en/demos/detail/bananabread -Ekr On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>wrote: > Chrome hasn't finished implementing SCTP-based data channels. I'll take > the blame for that. It's simply taken longer than I thought. I know it > may be a broken record at this point, but it should be done Real Soon Now > :). > > And once its done, I assume it will better than useless. > On Jul 17, 2013 3:11 PM, "Eric Rescorla" <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 1:46 AM, piranna@gmail.com <piranna@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> I agree, it was supossed to have operative DataChannels last December, >>> and the fact is that 7 months ago the proposed date they are fairly useless >>> and real-world usage of WebRTC are mainly proof of concept... I have ear >>> people saying WebRTC is a hype and others that's a technology could get to >>> be desacredited due to release it too early as it's hapenning now, only >>> don't now if just by an unlucky accident or it's being done this way in >>> purposse (too much decentrliced power on the browsers out of control of the >>> traditional owners...). >>> >> I'd like to focus on this point. In what way are data channels as >> currently specified >> "fairly useless"? >> >> -Ekr >> >> >>
Received on Thursday, 18 July 2013 01:47:51 UTC