- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 10:23:05 -0700
- To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
- Cc: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>, Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>, "Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)" <matthew.kaufman@skype.net>, "<rtcweb@ietf.org>" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
On 19 July 2013 10:09, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> wrote: > Are you proposing that Firefox come up with its own multiplexing mechanism > for RTP; Chrome its own; Opera, yet a third; IE, a fourth; and Safari, a > fifth? And then we just kind of pray that five proprietary solutions > developed in a vacuum miraculously work together? I mean, yeah, if we can > rely on miracle interop for independently-developed proprietary solutions, I > guess that works. I'm saying nothing of the sort. We definitely need to define what multiplexing looks like when it happens, but there's a vast gulf between that and defining how to negotiate it. Discussions on RTP shims or SSRC mux did consume some time, but I believe them to be done. For quite a while now. The negotiation part looks like it's nearing completion, but only after a fairly significant amount of wrangling and pain.
Received on Friday, 19 July 2013 17:23:32 UTC