W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > July 2013

Re: Locus of API discussion

From: cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 12:11:48 -0400
Message-ID: <51DC3644.4020107@bbs.darktech.org>
To: rtcweb@ietf.org, public-webrtc@w3.org
On 09/07/2013 11:33 AM, Ted Hardie wrote:
> Howdy,
> The recent set of API discussions has been spread across both the 
> rtcweb and public-webrtc mailing lists.  That's making it both harder 
> to follow and harder for folks to work out who is saying what under 
> which rules.  The chairs of both groups believe that the right place 
> for the discussion to continue should be public-webrtc.  Please direct 
> follow-ups on this topic to that list.
> regards,
> Ted Hardie

     I agree, with one caveat: virtually none of the high-level 
stakeholders (spec editors, browser vendors, etc) bother to engage the 
community on public-webrtc.

     What's the point of discussing the API on this mailing list if our 
opinion goes unnoticed? We shouldn't be moving the discussion to 
public-webrtc as a nice way to filter us out. This discussion requires 
their attention, be it on one mailing list or the other. I don't mind 
where we discuss it, so long as they get involved.

     Is it their intention to get involved on public-webrtc and 
summarize the results on rtcweb?

Received on Tuesday, 9 July 2013 16:13:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:17:49 UTC