- From: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
- Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2013 07:51:40 +0000
- To: Rob Manson <roBman@mob-labs.com>
- CC: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
On 7/21/13 8:28 AM, Rob Manson wrote: > Thanks Stefan. > > Yep...will do. I can see your input now, thanks! > > roBman > > > On 21/07/13 15:46, Stefan Håkansson LK wrote: >> Rob, >> >> Peter T has a spreadsheet at >> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AuaKXw3SkHMSdHlZdV9RN0xSWFhybVl4anJLRkVPV0E#gid=1 >> collecting the experiences made when using the WebRTC APIs. Could you >> enter what you have learned? The more people that contribute the better. >> >> Stefan >> >> On 7/21/13 1:08 AM, Rob Manson wrote: >>> +1 >>> >>> As a web developer that's spent a lot of time experimenting with the >>> currently specified version of the WebRTC related APIs and that's been >>> following the mailing list debates closely this really does seem like >>> the best resolution. >>> >>> It provides a more extensible and flexible architecture that can evolve >>> at "web developer speed" not "aligned browser release speed". And at >>> this speed it will also be less fragile. >>> >>> It provides a clear separation of concerns so people can use SDP where >>> they want, but not everyone is restricted by the timelines of other WGs >>> that are required to evolve SDP. >>> >>> And it would enable even more experimentation and future facing >>> development too. >>> >>> >>> Also, in terms of timing I think getting this right is more important >>> than the current commitment to a deadline. >>> >>> This is from the perspective of a web developer that has gone to all the >>> effort of just finishing a book on "Getting started with WebRTC" using >>> the existing API and who is also working on several commercial projects >>> based on the current API. >>> >>> So if anyone should be promoting "just get the first version out" then >>> it should be someone in my position. But I think you really will find >>> that most web developers would rather we got this abstraction right >>> first so we can avoid all of the extra support issues and application >>> re-work that will be required down the track if we don't. >>> >>> roBman >>> >>> >>> On 20/07/13 23:51, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: >>>> Let W3C experts to define a good JS API for WebRTC (with no SDP), let >>>> MMUSIC WG to define a SDP format for WebRTC, and then let JavaScript SIP >>>> experts to build JS libraries on top of it to play the SDP game, and we >>>> all will be happy. And telcos will be much more happy than they think. >>>> Let's get rid of all the SDP O/A stuff in the browser. The browser is >>>> not a phone and "fixed logic + fixed code" does not work here. >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > >
Received on Sunday, 21 July 2013 07:52:05 UTC