Re: Membership of this WG (Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers)

On 16/07/2013 8:41 AM, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
> These procedures are generally seen as a fallback to handle the cases 
> where consensus cannot be achieved; if we're discussing how to achieve 
> a majority vote to ignore a formal objection, in one sense we have 
> already lost. I hope we won't get there.
>
> However, at the moment, I can't find anyone named "Gili" or a company 
> named "Darktech" on the membership list, so it seems that the formal 
> procedures are not available to you; you're absolutely welcome to 
> participate in the consensus process, but if you want to raise issues 
> formally, you might want to consider Consortium membership.

     Thanks for pointing this out. I am going to look into joining.

Thank you,
Gili

Received on Tuesday, 16 July 2013 16:07:45 UTC