Re: Proposal: Different specifications for different target audiences

On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 4:33 PM, piranna@gmail.com <piranna@gmail.com>wrote:

> > P.S. We should really stop talking about signaling. I am pretty sure
> there
> > is a strong consensus that there is no need for direct browser-to-browser
> > signaling in webrtc. We have protocols for real time media and data, and
> > API. The signaling is implemented in JavaScript.
> >
> I agree, but we should start a discussion on another thread about how
> to develop a pure, server-less browser-to-browser signaling without
> parasiting other protocols since it's not really professional. On
> another thread it was suggested to me that it would be such a big
> issue that would require their own WG...
>

It's certainly not appropriate for this WG. Note that the IETF already has
had at least one effort in this space:

http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/p2psip/

-Ekr

Received on Sunday, 21 July 2013 23:40:59 UTC