Re: Locus of API discussion

On 09/07/2013 12:34 PM, Ted Hardie wrote:
> Hi Gili,
>
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 9:11 AM, cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org 
> <mailto:cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>> wrote:
>
>     Ted,
>
>         I agree, with one caveat: virtually none of the high-level
>     stakeholders (spec editors, browser vendors, etc) bother to engage
>     the community on public-webrtc.
>
>         What's the point of discussing the API on this mailing list if
>     our opinion goes unnoticed? We shouldn't be moving the discussion
>     to public-webrtc as a nice way to filter us out. This discussion
>     requires their attention, be it on one mailing list or the other.
>     I don't mind where we discuss it, so long as they get involved.
>
>
> You'll note that we are talking about the *public* webrtc list; there 
> should be no filter to participation on that list.  Having it on a 
> single list should lower the barrier to participation in the 
> discussion, since folks won't have to track the discussion across them 
> (and potentially repeat their points in both places).
Hi Ted,

     We are in agreement over moving all discussion to a single mailing 
list.

     I simply meant that the spec editors and browser vendors can use 
the fact that all discussion has been removed from rtcweb as an easy way 
to ignore the discussion altogether... and that's something I'd like to 
avoid.

Gili