- From: <piranna@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2013 23:10:07 +0200
- To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
- Cc: Martin Steinmann <martin@ezuce.com>, Robin Raymond <robin@hookflash.com>, cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>, "public-webrtc_w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>, Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>, Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>, Adam Bergkvist <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com>, Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>, Parthasarathi R <partha@parthasarathi.co.in>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
I admit I'm not a networks guy, but: > 0. A full list of ICE candidates: Also for DataChannels? I don't need to negotiate anything, is just a request about reliable or not... > - Not just the STUN addresses, since you might have two machines on the > same network. Ok, this is good. Also having the full routers-chain would allow to connect them directly without going out to Internet, just connect directly over the local LAN... :-) > - The priorities for the ICE candidates > 1. The ICE credentials (ufrag and password) > 2. The DTLS fingerprints Really is needed all this thing just for DataChannels? Could it be hidden someway? > Regardless of the exact design of the protocol (SDP or whatever), it seems > like it's > pretty desirable if implementors need to know these facts in order to do > anything > useful. > I'm talking about a high level developer point of view, I'm only interested on be able to make the connection and transfer data, no more, and I believe that for doing this a simpler API would be capable of doing it... -- "Si quieres viajar alrededor del mundo y ser invitado a hablar en un monton de sitios diferentes, simplemente escribe un sistema operativo Unix." – Linus Tordvals, creador del sistema operativo Linux
Received on Friday, 5 July 2013 21:10:54 UTC