W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > July 2013

Re: JavaScript API on top of SDP

From: cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 16:39:53 -0400
Message-ID: <51E5AF99.8020504@bbs.darktech.org>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
CC: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
On 16/07/2013 4:33 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 12:05 AM, cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org 
> <mailto:cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>> wrote:
>
>     Hi Eric,
>
>         I assume you are referring to
>     http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-11
>
>         I see the following problems with this document:
>
>      1. Section 4 states: "It is assumed that the user applications
>         are executed on a browser". This assertion flies in the face
>         of many of our use-cases.
>      2. Without API examples, there is no feedback mechanism of how
>         good/bad the API fits our use-cases. Recent conversations
>         highlight why need such a mechanism.
>      3. The document fails to explain the reasoning behind the design
>         decisions that were made.
>
>         Don't get me wrong: this is a good start. But this document is
>     to a Design Document what voting is to Democracy. It is just the
>     tip of the iceberg. We can, and should, do a lot more.
>
>
> Send text.
>
> -Ekr
>

     To what end? I'd be more than happy to contribute if the WG agrees 
to publish the Design Document I previously described. If they have no 
such plans, I'd like to know what process they advocate for turning 
those use-cases into an API, and what feedback mechanism will ensure 
that the API is acceptable before being published.

Thanks,
Gili
Received on Tuesday, 16 July 2013 20:40:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:35 UTC