W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > July 2013

Re: Teleco Integrators vs Web Developers vs Browser Implementers

From: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 17:43:00 +0200
Message-ID: <CALiegf=u6=zVkP8_Of8Sxf4n0Xbf9dw-0P2KnwHZPjG7dqMNng@mail.gmail.com>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Cc: cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>, Adrian Georgescu <ag@ag-projects.com>, Jesús Leganés Combarro <piranna@gmail.com>, Robin Raymond <robin@hookflash.com>, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>, Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>, Adam Bergkvist <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
2013/7/2 Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>

>
> Conversely, even if we were to discard SDP entirely at the interface to
> WebRTC, we would still need to specify SDP representations of these
> concepts in order to allow sensible interop of these features with
> SDP-using
> systems on the other end. For instance, if WebRTC implementations are
> to use trickle ICE and get that when they interoperate with SIP systems,
> then trickle ICE needs to be added to SDP.
>

And that would be a perfect task for MMUSIC WG, without making WebRTC to
depend on such a WG for every modification/additon/feature related to media.


-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>
Received on Tuesday, 2 July 2013 15:43:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:34 UTC