- From: Martin Steinmann <martin@ezuce.com>
- Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2013 13:40:06 -0400
- To: "'Robin Raymond'" <robin@hookflash.com>
- Cc: "'public-webrtc_w3.org'" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 5 July 2013 17:40:16 UTC
>From: Robin Raymond [mailto:robin@hookflash.com] >Sent: Friday, July 05, 2013 1:25 PM >To: Martin Steinmann >Cc: 'public-webrtc_w3.org' >Subject: RE: VS: Teleco Integrators vs Web Developers vs Browser Implementers > > >We already have an API that is very much disagreed upon by those of us actually trying to use it now! > >-Robin . meaning for those implementing P2P and other proprietary protocols such as Open Peer. It should not be about browser to browser, but browser to any and a standardization process like this is ill-suited to accommodate leading edge experiments with new protocols. --martin If you want to solve 'world hunger' you will likely never get to any API anyone will agree with. What I would suggest is that the group gets back to focus. The primary application is voice and video at least in my book and the standard protocols for that are SIP and XMPP and I haven't heard anything to the contrary on this list. Avoiding gateways and media anchoring points and enable seamless enterprise interop between different devices might cost you a few more bits on the wire or a bit more complexity for your proprietary app, but so be it. Otherwise, create your own browser plugin and you can do whatever. --martin
Received on Friday, 5 July 2013 17:40:16 UTC