W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > July 2013

Re: Moving forward with SDP control

From: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 15:25:24 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJrXDUH-3D0P8uCJZkCY6GvtkiPw1qLRALonkWCDO6xXyJu7aA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
Cc: Kiran Kumar <g.kiranreddy4u@gmail.com>, Jesús Leganés Combarro <piranna@gmail.com>, cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>, Likepeng <likepeng@huawei.com>, Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>, "Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)" <matthew.kaufman@skype.net>
On Jul 20, 2013 7:58 AM, "Iñaki Baz Castillo" <ibc@aliax.net> wrote:
> 2013/7/20 Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>:
> >  I'm hoping that 2.0 goes in the direction of "good low-level API that
> > higher-level APIs can build on", and we can go from there.
> I've never heard Cullen or others saying that 2.0 goes into that
> direction,

At the present, 2.0 only exists as a requirements gathering stage, so I
wouldn't expect any of the WG chairs to be saying what form it will take,
since it hasn't been decided, or even discussed yet.

> so I'm afraid of getting a unusable 1.0, and later a
> backward compatible 2.0 (wo SDP O/A forever and ever).

I'm curious:  As a web developer, if 2.0 were a great API that allowed you
to never touch SDP, would it matter to you if it were backward compatible
with 1.0?  How would that negatively impact you?

> --
> Iñaki Baz Castillo
> <ibc@aliax.net>
Received on Saturday, 20 July 2013 22:25:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:17:49 UTC