And it will be even less useless when we catch up with you (assuming interop works :). On Jul 17, 2013 6:47 PM, "Eric Rescorla" <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote: > It's certainly much better than useless in Firefox. > > https://developer.mozilla.org/en/demos/detail/bananabread > > -Ekr > > > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>wrote: > >> Chrome hasn't finished implementing SCTP-based data channels. I'll take >> the blame for that. It's simply taken longer than I thought. I know it >> may be a broken record at this point, but it should be done Real Soon Now >> :). >> >> And once its done, I assume it will better than useless. >> On Jul 17, 2013 3:11 PM, "Eric Rescorla" <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 1:46 AM, piranna@gmail.com <piranna@gmail.com>wrote: >>> >>>> I agree, it was supossed to have operative DataChannels last December, >>>> and the fact is that 7 months ago the proposed date they are fairly useless >>>> and real-world usage of WebRTC are mainly proof of concept... I have ear >>>> people saying WebRTC is a hype and others that's a technology could get to >>>> be desacredited due to release it too early as it's hapenning now, only >>>> don't now if just by an unlucky accident or it's being done this way in >>>> purposse (too much decentrliced power on the browsers out of control of the >>>> traditional owners...). >>>> >>> I'd like to focus on this point. In what way are data channels as >>> currently specified >>> "fairly useless"? >>> >>> -Ekr >>> >>> >>> >
Received on Thursday, 18 July 2013 02:01:02 UTC