W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > July 2013

Re: On babies and bathwater (was Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' opinions of the current WebRTC API and SDP as a control surface)

From: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 17:56:45 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJrXDUFX0nrUtQ4TFF+v2r2fbCUxQxDGmYzRHpYTBxOCeRao7Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>
Cc: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>, IƱaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>, "Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)" <matthew.kaufman@skype.net>, "<rtcweb@ietf.org>" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca> wrote:

>
> On Jul 19, 2013, at 10:18 AM, Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > It's interesting that most or your list of things that needed to be
> solved without SDP (simulcast, FEC, correlation of RTP streams with
> MediaStreamTracks, glare) still haven't been solved for WebRTC even with
> SDP, despite many months (years?) of effort.
> >
>
> Peter, with the exception of Simulcast, which of these do you think has
> not been solved in SDP when not using bundle?
>
>
>
Has FEC been defined for WebRTC?
Has glare been solved?
Has mapping of RTP streams with MediaStreamTracks been resolved (with the
exception of the "unity plan" which has not yet been approved)?

I think the whole list I gave is still unsolved/unresolved.
Received on Saturday, 20 July 2013 00:57:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:35 UTC