Re: Proposal: Different specifications for different target audiences

2013/7/22 piranna@gmail.com <piranna@gmail.com>:
> Maybe not directly plain SIP but an API that abstract it so maybe in the
> future it's being used XMPP instead (I've been working in this
> server-agnostic issue), but definitely "SIP in the browser" (or equivalent)
> as WebRTC spec defined signaling channel is not a bad idea... +1

I strongly hope you reconsider your +1 above. Rationale enough was
given about this subject two years ago.


--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>

Received on Monday, 22 July 2013 08:20:32 UTC