- From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 10:18:02 +0200
- To: Iņaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
- Cc: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+9kkMDx26E2NtznBtOuxei5p=5VmQkRnUGw7qqfHn7-455TAQ@mail.gmail.com>
Howdy, We have asked that folks avoid cross-posting, in order to keep it easier for folks to follow a thread. Please keep this discussion on public-webrtc. thanks, Ted Hardie On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 9:45 AM, Iņaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> wrote: > 2013/7/30 Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>: > > Since you seem to be doing a full mesh and you seem to be wanting to > > receive from everyone and be able to talk back to everyone, wouldn't > > this need to be 8 different SDP offers in a full mesh network rather > > than one SDP offer with 13 different m-lines? I don't follow how each > > of the recipients would pick the right m-line for themselves... > > > Silvia, I don't feel I am doing a full mesh, but something really > common, which is: > > - I contact, from my browser, to a conference server in which there is > an active conference with N participants. > > - I provide my audio and video tracks to the conference server. > > - The server provides me with N audio/video tracks belonging to N > participants. > > - I don't want to do a second SDP O/A round trip. > > Please, note that my browser has a signaling and a media session with > the conference server. This is, the endpoints are my browser and the > conference server. The fact that the conference server acts as a mixer > by joining all the participants changes nothing. The browser > establishes a single RTC session with the server. This is not an > exotic scenario at all. > > And no, I do not want to send 8 different SDP offers since I will > mantain just a single RTC session (with the conference server). All > the participants do the same, and the conference server is responsible > of taking all the tracks from participants and send them to all the > participants (via separate tracks). > > > I would like to hear the opinion of those in favour of SDP for WebRTC, > since what I am clearly stating is that SDP and Plan-Unified is *bad* > for this common scenario. > > > -- > Iņaki Baz Castillo > <ibc@aliax.net> > _______________________________________________ > rtcweb mailing list > rtcweb@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb >
Received on Tuesday, 30 July 2013 08:18:29 UTC