W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > July 2013

Re: Moving forward with SDP control

From: cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 02:11:29 -0400
Message-ID: <51E63591.5080508@bbs.darktech.org>
To: public-webrtc@w3.org
On 17/07/2013 12:45 AM, Robin Raymond wrote:
> The distinction is important. By mandating SDP, we must define every 
> support / optional / unsupported SDP attribute exposed from WebRTC 
> browser engines (even if they are merely generated in the SDP output 
> or accepted as input). Whereas we could just select what an engine 
> really needs to function properly and compatibly with existing systems 
> and expose nothing more.

     +1. The API should be driven by use-cases, not by SDP's 
implementation details.

http://lcsd05.cs.tamu.edu/slides/keynote.pdf slides 14 and 15 explain 
why this is such a big deal!

Gili
Received on Wednesday, 17 July 2013 06:12:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:35 UTC