Re: Moving forward with SDP control

On 17/07/2013 12:45 AM, Robin Raymond wrote:
> The distinction is important. By mandating SDP, we must define every 
> support / optional / unsupported SDP attribute exposed from WebRTC 
> browser engines (even if they are merely generated in the SDP output 
> or accepted as input). Whereas we could just select what an engine 
> really needs to function properly and compatibly with existing systems 
> and expose nothing more.

     +1. The API should be driven by use-cases, not by SDP's 
implementation details.

http://lcsd05.cs.tamu.edu/slides/keynote.pdf slides 14 and 15 explain 
why this is such a big deal!

Gili

Received on Wednesday, 17 July 2013 06:12:08 UTC