Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' opinions of the current WebRTC API and SDP as a control surface

2013/7/15 Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>:
> 1.  A year or so ago, almost everyone was against CU-RTCWEB.
>
> 2.  Since then, few, if any proposals to change or add to the core of the
> API have been proposed.  None have made any progress.  (Specifically, I mean
> things that would allow JS control without doing SDP mangling)
>
> 3.  There's a very, very strong push by working group leaders to stay
> focused on shipping the current API and not change or add anything major.
> Any discussion of any API changes or additions that would allow a JS app to
> do signaling without SDP is strongly frowned upon, because it would threaten
> the progress on the existing API.   It's even frowned upon to discuss with
> web developers what their use cases and pains are, since their feedback
> might threaten progress.
>
>
> Is that an accurate summary?

Yes.


--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>

Received on Monday, 15 July 2013 13:30:43 UTC