- From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 10:22:29 +0200
- To: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 18 July 2013 08:22:57 UTC
Apologies for sending this to the wrong list. I did not look carefully enough at the headers. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [rtcweb] e= lines (Re: Summary of Application Developers' opinions ..) Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 06:47:30 +0200 From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> To: rtcweb@ietf.org Matthew, thanks for sending 12 messages in 3 hours to the mailing list. Just one point on which I corrected you before, but since I see you're repeating it: On 07/17/2013 11:58 PM, Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE) wrote: > - What if someone adds an r= or p= or e=? The code for handling an e= line has been in Chrome since a very early release. You claimed in Lyon that you'd tested it and failed to have it parse, but I never saw the test case; you may have inserted it into the wrong place, rendering the SDP invalid. The SDP specification is quite strict about the order of these fields, exactly to make it simpler to write parsers. _______________________________________________ rtcweb mailing list rtcweb@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
Received on Thursday, 18 July 2013 08:22:57 UTC