Re: The best API possible (Was: Teleco Integrators vs Web Developers vs Browser Implementers) from piranna@gmail.com on 2013-07-06 (public-webrtc@w3.org from July 2013)

From: <piranna@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2013 10:39:19 +0200
To: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
Cc: Robin Raymond <robin@hookflash.com>, public-webrtc <public-webrtc@w3.org>, Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>, Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>, Adam Bergkvist <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com>, Yana Stamcheva <yana@jitsi.org>, Emil Ivov <emcho@jitsi.org>, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, Parthasarathi R <partha@parthasarathi.co.in>, tim panton <thp@westhawk.co.uk>, cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Martin Steinmann <martin@ezuce.com>
Message-ID: <CAKfGGh1cfqWYt0Q7c+F-Q4iyij6+ZqcpUvaw4Fuh-3XbUGM06g@mail.gmail.com>

> No. That is the argument of telcos because they want WebRTC to satisfy
> their current business model as fast as possible, regardless their
> ugly proposed "API" kills any future media signaling model in WebRTC.

Is this probably the reason why WebRTC have had so much focus on audio &
video? I don't find any other reason... :-/

Received on Saturday, 6 July 2013 08:39:46 UTC