W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > July 2013

Re: [SPAM] RE: VS: Teleco Integrators vs Web Developers vs Browser Implementers

From: <piranna@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2013 13:30:32 +0200
Message-ID: <CAKfGGh3PhEiSUe5J2EFLT+-K4ff0RX=2bDhtq2mBhKwhbCbcCQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Cc: Philipp Hancke <fippo@goodadvice.pages.de>, public-webrtc <public-webrtc@w3.org>
+1, in fact, I'm so much interested on DataChannels just for the web P2P
posibilities... :-D
El 06/07/2013 13:18, "Silvia Pfeiffer" <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> escribió:

> On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 6:46 PM, Philipp Hancke
> <fippo@goodadvice.pages.de> wrote:
> > On Sat, 6 Jul 2013, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:
> >>
> >> I think this is very true. The DataChannel will in fact be the one thing
> >> that will bring more innovation than anything
> >> else and treating it as second class can only hurt our progress. The
> idea
> >> of thinking DataChannel first before making
> >
> >
> > Innovation? Have you ever heard of Adobes RTMFP?
> >
> http://tv.adobe.com/watch/max-2008-develop/future-of-communication-with-rtmfp-by-matthew-kaufman/
> >
> http://tv.adobe.com/watch/max-2009-develop/p2p-on-the-flash-platform-with-rtmfp/
> >
> http://tv.adobe.com/watch/max-2011-develop/advanced-p2p-with-rtmfp-tips-and-tricks/
> > Note how old those slides are... and how advanced concepts like the
> netgroup
> > are.
> >
> > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-thornburgh-adobe-rtmfp-09 even
> specifies
> > the wire protocol. IIRC it has audio/video and data at equal rank even.
> >
> > That "innovation" has been available for years, yet nobody really used
> it.
>
> You misunderstood - I referred to innovation of peer-to-peer
> applications on the Web, not about making audio and video be
> transported over the data channel. While the latter is possible, I do
> think we need to make custom approaches for audio and video. What bugs
> me a bit though is that we make decisions on audio and video first and
> then think about how to simplify it for data, rather than the other
> way round: solving the simple case first and then adding functionality
> for the more specific use cases.
>
> Anyway - we frequently re-invent things for the Web that have been
> done before and when we do so, new things are made possible. I'm
> personally curious to see where this will all take us!
>
> Cheers,
> Silvia.
>
>
Received on Saturday, 6 July 2013 11:31:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:34 UTC