W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > July 2013

Re: On babies and bathwater (was Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' opinions of the current WebRTC API and SDP as a control surface)

From: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 12:13:29 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJrXDUFotgSrjR4LBK3knDQUKFjNjLxAwuGMJHFVoC0JEV6yxA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Cc: IƱaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>, Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>, "Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)" <matthew.kaufman@skype.net>, "<rtcweb@ietf.org>" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> wrote:

> On 7/19/13 13:47, Peter Thatcher wrote:
>
>>  Do you really believe all of them are naive and full of hubris?
>>
>
> No, I think they're using an API that is nowhere near finished yet, which
> is necessarily going to be painful. The complaints are legitimate.
>
>
"nowhere near finished yet"?  Yikes.  We just spent almost a year arguing
about what an m-line is.  What's your timeline for finishing?

The scapegoating of SDP is what's misguided.


Well, I guess we're going to have to agree to disagree, because from my
perspective as a web developer and a browser implementer, the API being
based on SDP Offer/Answer is the heart of the problem, and not just a
scapegoat.  I hope that we can do much better in a 2.0 API while
maintaining legacy interop (make everyone happy), but of course I'll
refrain from talking about that further until the right time has come.



>
>
> /a
>
Received on Friday, 19 July 2013 19:14:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:35 UTC