W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > July 2013

Re: Locus of API discussion

From: Cullen Jennings (fluffy) <fluffy@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 04:54:06 +0000
To: "Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)" <matthew.kaufman@skype.net>
CC: cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <C5E08FE080ACFD4DAE31E4BDBF944EB113608690@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com>

On Jul 17, 2013, at 3:31 PM, Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE) <matthew.kaufman@skype.net> wrote:

> 
> From: cowwoc [mailto:cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org]:
> 
>     	We are in agreement over moving all discussion to a single mailing list.
> 
>  	   I simply meant that the spec editors and browser vendors can use the fact that all discussion has been removed from rtcweb 
> 	as an easy way to ignore the discussion altogether... and that's something I'd like to avoid.
> 
> Oh, you'll note that the spec editors and chairs are already ignoring most of what the application developer community has said about the current specification, so you shouldn't notice much of a change.
> 
> Matthew Kaufman
> 
> 

Mathew this is simply not true. Thought most the people in the WG did not want to go with the Microsoft proposal, the editors, chairs, and WG have been very responsive to feedback from the application developer community. I view your constant claiming this is not true as highly unprofessional. 

I realize most the people in the WG rejected your proposal but they have incorporated many other proposal from application developers. 
Received on Wednesday, 24 July 2013 04:54:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:35 UTC