public-webapps@w3.org from April to June 2009 by author

Aaron Boodman

• Re: File API Feedback (Tuesday, 30 June)
• Re: File API Feedback (Tuesday, 30 June)
• Re: Handling too few arguments in method calls (Tuesday, 23 June)
• Re: [widgets] Public keys in widgets URI scheme? (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: [widgets] Public keys in widgets URI scheme? (Tuesday, 16 June)
• Re: [widgets] Public keys in widgets URI scheme? (Wednesday, 27 May)

Adam Barth

• Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header? (Sunday, 28 June)
• Re: [cors] TAG request concerning CORS & Next Step(s) (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header? (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: [cors] TAG request concerning CORS & Next Step(s) (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: [cors] TAG request concerning CORS & Next Step(s) (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: [cors] TAG request concerning CORS & Next Step(s) (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header? (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: [cors] TAG request concerning CORS & Next Step(s) (Wednesday, 24 June)
• Re: [cors] Review (Monday, 22 June)
• Re: [cors] Review (Monday, 22 June)
• Re: [cors] Review (Monday, 22 June)
• Re: [cors] Review (Monday, 22 June)
• Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header? (Saturday, 20 June)
• Re: XHR and sandboxed iframes (was: Re: XHR without user credentials) (Thursday, 18 June)
• Re: XHR and sandboxed iframes (was: Re: XHR without user credentials) (Thursday, 18 June)
• Re: [cors] Review (Thursday, 18 June)
• Re: [cors] Review (Thursday, 18 June)
• Re: [cors] Review (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: XHR without user credentials (Saturday, 13 June)
• Re: XHR without user credentials (Saturday, 13 June)
• Re: XHR without user credentials (Saturday, 13 June)
• Re: XHR without user credentials (Saturday, 13 June)
• Re: XHR without user credentials (Saturday, 13 June)
• Re: Origin enables XSS to escalate to XSRF (was: security issue with XMLHttpRequest API compatibility) (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: Redirect and Origin (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Re: Redirect and Origin (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Re: Redirect and Origin (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Re: XHR without user credentials (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Re: XHR without user credentials (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Re: CSRF: alternative solutions (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Re: XHR without user credentials (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Re: CSRF: alternative solutions (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Re: CSRF: alternative solutions (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Re: XHR without user credentials (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Re: Origin enables XSS to escalate to XSRF (was: security issue with XMLHttpRequest API compatibility) (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Re: Origin enables XSS to escalate to XSRF (was: security issue with XMLHttpRequest API compatibility) (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: Origin enables XSS to escalate to XSRF (was: security issue with XMLHttpRequest API compatibility) (Sunday, 7 June)
• Re: Origin enables XSS to escalate to XSRF (was: security issue with XMLHttpRequest API compatibility) (Sunday, 7 June)
• Re: Origin enables XSS to escalate to XSRF (was: security issue with XMLHttpRequest API compatibility) (Sunday, 7 June)
• Re: Origin enables XSS to escalate to XSRF (was: security issue with XMLHttpRequest API compatibility) (Sunday, 7 June)
• Re: Origin enables XSS to escalate to XSRF (was: security issue with XMLHttpRequest API compatibility) (Sunday, 7 June)
• Re: Origin enables XSS to escalate to XSRF (was: security issue with XMLHttpRequest API compatibility) (Sunday, 7 June)
• Re: [widgets] Public keys in widgets URI scheme? (Wednesday, 27 May)
• Re: [widgets] Public keys in widgets URI scheme? (Wednesday, 27 May)
• Re: [widgets] Public keys in widgets URI scheme? (Wednesday, 27 May)
• Re: [widgets] Public keys in widgets URI scheme? (Wednesday, 27 May)
• [widgets] Public keys in widgets URI scheme? (Wednesday, 27 May)
• Re: [widget] Security model (Monday, 25 May)
• Re: [widget] Security model (Monday, 25 May)
• Re: [widget] Security model (Monday, 25 May)
• Re: WebStorage feedback (Wednesday, 29 April)
• Re: [webstorage] disk space (Tuesday, 28 April)
• Re: HTML5 Origin (aka IETF Origin draft) (Saturday, 11 April)
• Re: HTML5 Origin (aka IETF Origin draft) (Saturday, 11 April)
• Re: HTML5 Origin (aka IETF Origin draft) (Friday, 10 April)
• Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header? (Thursday, 9 April)
• Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header? (Thursday, 9 April)
• Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header? (Thursday, 9 April)
• Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header? (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header? (Tuesday, 7 April)
• Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header? (Tuesday, 7 April)
• Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header? (Monday, 6 April)
• Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header? (Monday, 6 April)
• Re: CORS for file-based web apps (Monday, 6 April)
• Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header? (Sunday, 5 April)
• Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header? (Sunday, 5 April)

Adrian Bateman

• RE: [cors] TAG request concerning CORS & Next Step(s) (Thursday, 25 June)
• RE: [cors] TAG request concerning CORS & Next Step(s) (Thursday, 25 June)
• RE: [cors] TAG request concerning CORS & Next Step(s) (Wednesday, 24 June)
• RE: [webstorage] Ambiguous Requirement for Key Ordering (Monday, 22 June)
• RE: File API Feedback (Friday, 19 June)

Alex Russell

• addEventListener naming (Friday, 24 April)

Alexey Proskuryakov

• Re: [cors] Redirects (Thursday, 23 April)
• Re: [XHR] Authorization header (Wednesday, 1 April)
• [XHR] Authorization header (Wednesday, 1 April)

Andrew Sledd

• Belated Regretts for telcon. (Thursday, 25 June)
• Regrets for Thrusday's Widgets call /eom (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: [widgets] Regrets for 28 May 2009 Voice Conference (Thursday, 28 May)
• Regretts Telecon Thursday 30 April (Thursday, 30 April)
• Re: Preferences for the I18N model (Thursday, 30 April)
• Re: [widgets] i18n proposals document (Wednesday, 29 April)

Andrew Welch

• Re: [Widgets] Widget Gallery RSS like sharing format (Monday, 20 April)

Anne van Kesteren

• Re: Specs using Web IDL (Sunday, 28 June)
• Re: XHR and sandboxed iframes (Saturday, 27 June)
• Re: Points of order on this WG (Friday, 26 June)
• Re: Points of order on this WG (Friday, 26 June)
• Re: Points of order on this WG (Friday, 26 June)
• Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header? (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: [cors] TAG request concerning CORS & Next Step(s) (Wednesday, 24 June)
• Re: [XHR] XMLHttpRequest name (Tuesday, 23 June)
• Re: [XHR] XMLHttpRequest name (Tuesday, 23 June)
• Re: Progress Events normative text (Monday, 22 June)
• Re: Input events, checkboxes and radio buttons (Monday, 22 June)
• Re: Input events, checkboxes and radio buttons (Saturday, 20 June)
• Re: Input events, checkboxes and radio buttons (Saturday, 20 June)
• Re: Web IDL syntax (Friday, 19 June)
• Re: File API Feedback (Friday, 19 June)
• File API Feedback (Thursday, 18 June)
• Re: XHR and sandboxed iframes (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: [cors] Review (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: Dated URI for "Widgets 1.0: URI Scheme" seems to be broken (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: [cors] Review (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: [cors] origin and redirects (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: XHR and sandboxed iframes (was: Re: XHR without user credentials) (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: Progress Events normative text (Wednesday, 17 June)
• XHR and sandboxed iframes (was: Re: XHR without user credentials) (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: [WebIDL] overloading and fallback (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: [webidl] DOMString (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: 'scroll' and 'resize' events (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: [cors] Review (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: [cors] Web application (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: [cors] Web application (Tuesday, 16 June)
• [cors] origin and redirects (Tuesday, 16 June)
• Re: [cors] Review (Tuesday, 16 June)
• Re: [cors] Web application (Tuesday, 16 June)
• Re: [cors] Web application (Monday, 15 June)
• [cors] Web application (Monday, 15 June)
• Re: [cors] Review (Monday, 15 June)
• Re: [cors] Review (Sunday, 14 June)
• Re: [XHR] Authorization header (Saturday, 13 June)
• Re: [cors] Review (Saturday, 13 June)
• Re: [cors] Review (Saturday, 13 June)
• Re: Progress Events normative text (Saturday, 13 June)
• Re: XHR without user credentials (Saturday, 13 June)
• Re: [webworkers] Tasks (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: Origin enables XSS to escalate to XSRF (Thursday, 11 June)
• [widgets] Step 7 - Process the Configuration Document (Wednesday, 10 June)
• [WebIDL] double (Wednesday, 10 June)
• [widgets] Elements are grouped by language: (Wednesday, 10 June)
• [widgets] One element is allowed per language: (Wednesday, 10 June)
• [widgets] Verify Zip archive (Wednesday, 10 June)
• [widgets] Rule for Determining if a potential Zip archive is a Zip archive (Wednesday, 10 June)
• Re: [widgets] Rule for finding a file within a widget package (Wednesday, 10 June)
• [widgets] Rule for Identifying the media type of a file (Wednesday, 10 June)
• [widgets] Rule for Identifying the Media Type of an Image (Wednesday, 10 June)
• [widgets] Rule for Parsing a Non-negative Integer (Wednesday, 10 June)
• [widgets] Rule for Getting Text Content with Normalized White Space (Wednesday, 10 June)
• [widgets] Rule for Getting Text Content (Wednesday, 10 June)
• [widgets] editorial style (Wednesday, 10 June)
• [widgets] Rule for getting a single attribute value (Wednesday, 10 June)
• [widgets] Rule for finding a file within a widget package (Wednesday, 10 June)
• [widgets] Rule for dealing with an invalid Zip archive (Wednesday, 10 June)
• [widgets] Rule for extracting file data from a file entry (Wednesday, 10 June)
• [widgets] Editorial: 9x Processing (Wednesday, 10 June)
• Re: Redirect and Origin (Wednesday, 10 June)
• Re: Redirect and Origin (Wednesday, 10 June)
• Re: XHR without user credentials (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Re: XHR without user credentials (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Re: XHR without user credentials (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Re: WebSocket question (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Re: [widgets] What does it mean to have an unavailable API (Tuesday, 9 June)
• [WebIDL] overloading and fallback (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Re: XHR without user credentials (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Re: [widgets] What does it mean to have an unavailable API (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Re: XHR without user credentials (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: [widgets] What does it mean to have an unavailable API (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: XHR without user credentials (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: XHR without user credentials (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: "send data using the Web Socket" and UCS-2 (Thursday, 4 June)
• [webworkers] Tasks (Tuesday, 26 May)
• Re: [widgets] Widgets URI scheme... it's baaaack! (Saturday, 23 May)
• Re: [widgets] Widgets URI scheme... it's baaaack! (Saturday, 23 May)
• Re: [widgets] Widgets URI scheme... it's baaaack! (Friday, 22 May)
• Re: [widgets] Widgets URI scheme... it's baaaack! (Friday, 22 May)
• Re: WebStorage feedback (Monday, 18 May)
• Re: Next steps for XHR L1 spec? (Monday, 4 May)
• Re: Next steps for XHR L1 spec? (Monday, 4 May)
• Re: XHR and the storage mutex (Monday, 4 May)
• Re: [webidl] XMLHttpRequest interface object (Thursday, 30 April)
• [webidl] XMLHttpRequest interface object (Thursday, 30 April)
• Re: Storage 'length' and enumeration (Wednesday, 29 April)
• [webstorage] disk space (Tuesday, 28 April)
• Re: Proposal for addition to WebStorage (Tuesday, 28 April)
• Re: [webidl] definition of const string literal (Monday, 27 April)
• [webstorage] inactive documents (Monday, 27 April)
• Re: Proposal for addition to WebStorage (Monday, 27 April)
• [webstorage] storage event should be dispatched async (Friday, 24 April)
• [webstorage] events (Friday, 24 April)
• [webstorage] fork bombing (Friday, 24 April)
• Re: Web Storage Scope and Charter (Friday, 24 April)
• Re: Web Storage Scope and Charter (Thursday, 23 April)
• Re: [cors] Redirects (Thursday, 23 April)
• Re: [cors] Redirects (Thursday, 23 April)
• Re: Progress Events normative text (Wednesday, 22 April)
• Re: Next steps for CORS? (Wednesday, 22 April)
• Re: [cors] Redirects (Wednesday, 22 April)
• Re: [webidl] DOMString (Tuesday, 21 April)
• [webidl] DOMString (Tuesday, 21 April)
• Re: Next steps for CORS? (Monday, 13 April)
• Re: [cors] security issue with XMLHttpRequest API compatibility (Tuesday, 7 April)
• Re: [cors] security issue with XMLHttpRequest API compatibility (Monday, 6 April)
• Re: [widgets] dropping Asynchronous HTTP Requests and Storage (Monday, 6 April)
• Re: [widgets] dropping Asynchronous HTTP Requests and Storage (Monday, 6 April)
• Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header? (Saturday, 4 April)
• Re: [XHR] Authorization header (Wednesday, 1 April)
• Re: [XHR] Authorization header (Wednesday, 1 April)

Arthur Barstow

• Widgets PAG seeks feedback on Widget Updates spec (Monday, 29 June)
• Re: Specs using Web IDL (Saturday, 27 June)
• Re: [widgets] Draft Minutes from 25 June 2009 Voice Conference (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: Points of order on this WG (Thursday, 25 June)
• [widgets] Draft Minutes from 25 June 2009 Voice Conference (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: [selectors-api] Transitioning to CR (Wednesday, 24 June)
• [widgets] Draft Agenda for 25 June 2009 Voice Conference (Wednesday, 24 June)
• [cors] TAG request concerning CORS & Next Step(s) (Wednesday, 24 June)
• Request for comments: Delivery Context Ontology Last Call; Deadline 7 Aug 2009 (Tuesday, 23 June)
• Reminder: Public call for prior art on Widget updates (Friday, 19 June)
• Request for Comments: FPWD of Widgets 1.0: Access Requests Policy spec (Thursday, 18 June)
• Request for Comments: FPWD of Widgets 1.0: URI Scheme spec (Thursday, 18 June)
• [widgets] Draft Minutes from 18 June 2009 Voice Conference (Thursday, 18 June)
• Re: Dated URI for "Widgets 1.0: URI Scheme" seems to be broken (Wednesday, 17 June)
• [widgets] Draft Agenda for 18 June 2009 Voice Conference (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: XBL2 Status? (Wednesday, 17 June)
• [widgets] Specifying the view modes (Tuesday, 16 June)
• New WD of Use Cases and Requirements for Ontology and API for Media Object 1.0 (Tuesday, 16 June)
• Reminder: June 19 deadline for comments re LCWD of Widgets 1.0: Packaging and Configuration spec (Friday, 12 June)
• [widgets] Draft Minutes from 11 June 2009 f2f meeting (Friday, 12 June)
• [widgets] Draft Minutes from 10 June 2009 f2f meeting (Friday, 12 June)
• [widgets] Draft Minutes from 9 June 2009 f2f meeting (Friday, 12 June)
• Fwd: [widgets] P&C LC#2 comment regarding icons (Friday, 5 June)
• [widgets] Draft Minutes from 4 June 2009 Voice Conference (Thursday, 4 June)
• Re: [widgets] P&C Last Call comments, viewmodes, referencing other specs, guarantee of consistency (Wednesday, 3 June)
• [widgets] Draft Agenda for 4 June 2009 Voice Conference (Wednesday, 3 June)
• Re: XBL2 Status? (Tuesday, 2 June)
• [widgets] Moving Widgets 1.0: Digital Signature spec to Candidate Recommendation (Tuesday, 2 June)
• Request For Comments: Last Call WD of Widgets 1.0: Packaging and Configuration; deadline 19 June 2009 (Thursday, 28 May)
• [widgets] Draft Minutes from 28 May 2009 Voice Conference (Thursday, 28 May)
• [widgets] Draft Agenda for 28 May 2009 Voice Conference (Wednesday, 27 May)
• Re: [widgets] Call for Input: Use Cases and Requirements for Widgets Access Request spec (Friday, 22 May)
• Reminder: Comments for LCWD of Widgets 1.0: Digital Signatures due June 1 (Thursday, 21 May)
• [widgets] Call for Input: Use Cases and Requirements for Widgets Access Request spec (Thursday, 21 May)
• [widgets] Draft Minutes from 21 May 2009 Voice Conference (Thursday, 21 May)
• Re: More complete draft for Widgets: Access Requests (Thursday, 21 May)
• [widgets] Draft Agenda for 21 May 2009 Voice Conference (Tuesday, 19 May)
• [widgets] Draft Minutes from 19 May 2009 Widgets Security VC (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: [widgets] Draft Minutes from 14 May 2009 Voice Conference (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: [widgets] Draft Minutes from 14 May 2009 Voice Conference (Monday, 18 May)
• [widgets] Draft Agenda for 19 May 2009 Widgets Security VC (Monday, 18 May)
• [widgets] Draft Minutes from 18 May 2009 Widgets Security VC (Monday, 18 May)
• Re: [widgets] Security Model call on May 18 @ 13:00 Paris time (Monday, 18 May)
• [admin] Documenting some of WebApps' Work Modes (Sunday, 17 May)
• [widgets] Security Model call on May 18 @ 13:00 Paris time (Friday, 15 May)
• Re: [widgets] Getting A&E spec to Last Call (Thursday, 14 May)
• [widgets] Draft Minutes from 14 May 2009 Voice Conference (Thursday, 14 May)
• [widgets] Agenda for 14 May 2009 Voice Conference (Wednesday, 13 May)
• [widgets] Getting A&E spec to Last Call (Tuesday, 12 May)
• Re: [widgets] dig sig and requirements ready for pub! (Friday, 8 May)
• [widgets] Draft minutes from 7 May 2009 Voice Conference (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: [widgets] Call for Additional Editor(s) for P&C spec (Thursday, 7 May)
• [widgets] Call for Additional Editor(s) for P&C spec (Thursday, 7 May)
• [widgets] Draft Agenda for 7 May 2009 Voice Conference (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Re: [widgets] dig sig and requirements ready for pub! (Tuesday, 5 May)
• Re: [widgets] dig sig and requirements ready for pub! (Monday, 4 May)
• Re: New CfC Re: [Selectors API] Call for Consensus - approve John Resig's tests (Saturday, 2 May)
• LCWD of Widgets 1.0: Digital Signatures published 30-Apr-2009 (Friday, 1 May)
• Re: [widgets] Comments to <access> element text (Friday, 1 May)
• [widgets] Draft Minutes from 30 April 2009 Voice Conference (Thursday, 30 April)
• Re: I18N issue: case-sensitivity of locale subdirectories (Wednesday, 29 April)
• [widgets] Draft Agenda for 30 April 2009 Voice Conference (Wednesday, 29 April)
• [widgets] Publishing LCWD of Widgets Digital Signatures and new WD of Requirements (Monday, 27 April)
• [widgets] Identifying all security related issues with "core" Widgets specs (Monday, 27 April)
• Fwd: Proposal for new WG to specify "Concrete APIs" (Friday, 24 April)
• [widgets] Proposal to Close: ISSUE-81: ECDSAwithSHA256 as required algorithm in place of DSAwithSHA256? (Thursday, 23 April)
• [widgets] Draft Minutes from 23 April 2003 Voice Conference (Thursday, 23 April)
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-83 (Wednesday, 22 April)
• Re: [widgets] i18n proposals document (Wednesday, 22 April)
• [widgets] Agenda for 23 April 2009 Voice Conference (Wednesday, 22 April)
• Re: Next steps for CORS? (Saturday, 18 April)
• Re: [widgets] dropping screenshot (Saturday, 18 April)
• [widgets] Draft Minutes from 16 April 2009 Widgets Voice Conference (Thursday, 16 April)
• Re: June F2F (Thursday, 16 April)
• [widgets] Agenda for 16 April 2009 Voice Conference (Tuesday, 14 April)
• Re: [cors] security issue with XMLHttpRequest API compatibility (Tuesday, 14 April)
• Re: ISSUE-83 (digsig should not be read at runtime): Instantiated widget should not be able to read digital signature [Widgets] (Monday, 13 April)
• Re: CfC: FPWD of Server-Sent Events, Web Sockets API, Web Storage, and Web Workers; deadline April 10 (Friday, 10 April)
• Re: ISSUE-83 (digsig should not be read at runtime): Instantiated widget should not be able to read digital signature [Widgets] (Thursday, 9 April)
• Re: [widgets] dropping Asynchronous HTTP Requests and Storage (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: ISSUE-83 (digsig should not be read at runtime): Instantiated widget should not be able to read digital signature [Widgets] (Tuesday, 7 April)
• [widgets] Synching Widgets DigSig with XML Signatures 1.1 and Signatures Properties (Tuesday, 7 April)
• Re: [widgets] remove update related methods form A&E (Monday, 6 April)
• Re: [widgets] dropping Asynchronous HTTP Requests and Storage (Monday, 6 April)
• Re: CfC: FPWD of Server-Sent Events, Web Sockets API, Web Storage, and Web Workers; deadline April 10 (Thursday, 2 April)
• CfC: FPWD of Server-Sent Events, Web Sockets API, Web Storage, and Web Workers; deadline April 10 (Thursday, 2 April)
• [widgets] New WD of Widgets 1.0: Digital Signatures spec published on March 31 (Thursday, 2 April)
• [widgets] Draft Minutes from 2 April 2009 Voice Conference (Thursday, 2 April)
• [widgets] Agenda for 2 April 2009 Voice Conference; NOTE TIME CHANGE FOR NON-US! (Wednesday, 1 April)
• [widgets] Widget spec plan presented to BONDI Steering Group (Wednesday, 1 April)

Arun Ranganathan

• Re: File API Feedback (Tuesday, 30 June)
• Re: File API Feedback (Monday, 29 June)
• Re: File API Feedback (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: File API Feedback (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: Points of order on this WG (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: [cors] TAG request concerning CORS & Next Step(s) (Wednesday, 24 June)
• Re: File API Feedback (Friday, 19 June)
• Re: File API Feedback (Friday, 19 June)
• Re: "W3C and APIs" writeup from TAG members (Thursday, 18 June)
• Re: File API Feedback (Thursday, 18 June)
• Re: File API Feedback (Thursday, 18 June)
• Re: File API, Editor's Draft II (Thursday, 18 June)
• Re: File API - W3C Working Draft 7 June 2009 (Thursday, 18 June)
• File API, Editor's Draft II (Thursday, 11 June)

Arve Bersvendsen

• Re: [widgets] Please include a statement of purpose and user interaction expectations for <feature> (Tuesday, 2 June)
• Re: [widgets] Public keys in widgets URI scheme? (Wednesday, 27 May)
• Re: [widgets] Public keys in widgets URI scheme? (Wednesday, 27 May)
• Re: [widgets] Widgets URI scheme... it's baaaack! (Wednesday, 27 May)
• Re: [widgets] Widgets URI scheme... it's baaaack! (Friday, 22 May)
• Re: [widgets] Widgets URI scheme... it's baaaack! (Friday, 22 May)
• Re: [widgets] Widgets URI scheme... it's baaaack! (Friday, 22 May)
• Re: [widgets] Widgets URI scheme... it's baaaack! (Friday, 22 May)
• Re: [widgets] Widgets URI scheme... it's baaaack! (Friday, 22 May)
• Re: [widgets] Call for Input: Use Cases and Requirements for Widgets Access Request spec (Friday, 22 May)
• Re: [widget] Security model (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: [widgets] window modes in P&C, was Re: Small question aboutlatestversionof "P&C specs" (11th Mar 2009) (Monday, 11 May)
• Re: [widgets] window modes in P&C, was Re: Small question about latestversion of "P&C specs" (11th Mar 2009) (Monday, 11 May)
• Re: Storage and widgets (Monday, 27 April)
• Re: [Proposal] Empowering the Widget to ask fro "mode change" in A&E (Friday, 24 April)
• Re: [Proposal] Empowering the Widget to ask fro "mode change" in A&E (Friday, 24 April)
• Re: Storage and widgets (Friday, 24 April)
• New Widgets A&E Editors Draft (Thursday, 16 April)
• [Widgets A&E] Removing show() and hide() (Thursday, 16 April)

Ben Dodson

• Re: WebSocket question (Wednesday, 10 June)
• WebSocket question (Friday, 5 June)

Bil Corry

• Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header? (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header? (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: [cors] TAG request concerning CORS & Next Step(s) (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header? (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: [cors] TAG request concerning CORS & Next Step(s) (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: [cors] TAG request concerning CORS & Next Step(s) (Wednesday, 24 June)
• Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header? (Saturday, 20 June)
• Re: HTML5 Origin (aka IETF Origin draft) (Saturday, 11 April)
• Re: HTML5 Origin (aka IETF Origin draft) (Saturday, 11 April)
• Re: HTML5 Origin (aka IETF Origin draft) (Saturday, 11 April)
• HTML5 Origin (aka IETF Origin draft) (Thursday, 9 April)
• Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header? (Thursday, 9 April)
• Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header? (Thursday, 9 April)
• Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header? (Thursday, 9 April)
• Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header? (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header? (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header? (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header? (Tuesday, 7 April)
• Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header? (Monday, 6 April)
• Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header? (Monday, 6 April)
• Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header? (Monday, 6 April)
• Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header? (Monday, 6 April)
• Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header? (Monday, 6 April)
• Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header? (Friday, 3 April)
• Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header? (Friday, 3 April)

Bjoern Hoehrmann

• Re: [cors] Redirects (Thursday, 23 April)

Boris Zbarsky

• Re: Web IDL syntax (Tuesday, 30 June)
• Re: [selectors-api] Transitioning to CR (Friday, 19 June)
• Re: [selectors-api] Transitioning to CR (Friday, 19 June)
• Re: File API Feedback (Friday, 19 June)
• Re: [webidl] XMLHttpRequest interface object (Friday, 5 June)
• Re: Mutation events replacement (Thursday, 4 June)
• Re: [webidl] XMLHttpRequest interface object (Thursday, 30 April)
• Re: Storage 'length' and enumeration (Thursday, 30 April)
• Re: Storage 'length' and enumeration (Wednesday, 29 April)
• Re: Web Storage & SQL (Friday, 10 April)
• Re: Web Storage & SQL (Friday, 10 April)
• Re: Web Storage & SQL (Friday, 10 April)
• Re: Web Storage & SQL (Thursday, 9 April)
• Re: Web Storage & SQL (Thursday, 9 April)
• Re: Web Storage & SQL (Thursday, 9 April)

Brandon Sterne

• Content Security Policy - Updated Spec (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header? (Monday, 6 April)

Braun, Andrew

• RE: London F2F invitation (Monday, 1 June)

Cameron McCormack

• Re: Web IDL syntax (Tuesday, 30 June)
• Re: Fw: An import statement for Web IDL (Tuesday, 30 June)
• Re: An import statement for Web IDL (Tuesday, 30 June)
• Fw: An import statement for Web IDL (Tuesday, 30 June)
• An import statement for Web IDL (Monday, 29 June)
• Re: Specs using Web IDL (Monday, 29 June)
• Re: Specs using Web IDL (Sunday, 28 June)
• Re: Specs using Web IDL (Sunday, 28 June)
• Specs using Web IDL (Saturday, 27 June)
• Re: [WebIDL] "module" in ECMAScript (Saturday, 27 June)
• Re: Handling too few arguments in method calls (Saturday, 27 June)
• Re: Handling too few arguments in method calls (Friday, 26 June)
• Re: Handling too few arguments in method calls (Friday, 26 June)
• Re: Handling too few arguments in method calls (Friday, 26 June)
• Re: [WebIDL] Callback, PropertyOnly, NoInterfaceObject (Friday, 26 June)
• Re: Handling too few arguments in method calls (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: Handling too few arguments in method calls (Thursday, 25 June)
• Handling too few arguments in method calls (Monday, 22 June)
• Re: [selectors-api] Return value of lookupNamespaceURI (Sunday, 21 June)
• Re: [NameCreator] definition buggy (Saturday, 20 June)
• Re: [PrototypeRoot] (Saturday, 20 June)
• Re: [PrototypeRoot] (Saturday, 20 June)
• Re: [webidl] DOMString (Saturday, 20 June)
• Re: [bindings] Regarding the algorithm of 4.2.2. Interface prototype object (Friday, 19 June)
• Re: [Bindings] [[Delete]], hidden operations, missing arguments (Friday, 19 June)
• Re: Web IDL syntax (Friday, 19 June)
• Web IDL syntax (Friday, 19 June)
• Re: [WebIDL] On overloaded operations in an effective overload set (Friday, 19 June)
• Re: [WebIDL] overloading and fallback (Friday, 19 June)
• Re: [WebIDL] On overloaded operations in an effective overload set (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: [webidl] DOMString (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: [WebIDL] On overloaded operations in an effective overload set (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: [WebIDL] overloading and fallback (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: "send data using the Web Socket" and UCS-2 (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: [WebIDL] double (Monday, 15 June)
• Re: [WebIDL] double (Sunday, 14 June)
• Re: [webidl] definition of const string literal (Sunday, 14 June)
• Re: [WebIDL] double (Sunday, 14 June)
• Re: [widgets] P&C Last Call comments, versioning (Monday, 1 June)
• Re: [WebIDL] "module" in ECMAScript (Monday, 1 June)
• Re: [webidl] definition of const string literal (Tuesday, 28 April)
• Re: [webidl] DOMString (Wednesday, 22 April)
• Re: [webidl] DOMString (Wednesday, 22 April)
• Re: [webidl] DOMString (Wednesday, 22 April)

Charles McCathieNevile

• Exit criteria Re: [selectors-api] Transitioning to CR (Wednesday, 24 June)
• Re: Progress Events normative text (Saturday, 20 June)
• Re: [selectors-api] Transitioning to CR (Saturday, 20 June)
• Events Re: 'scroll' and 'resize' events (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: Progress Events normative text (Monday, 15 June)
• to www-dom Re: [DOM3Events] Use cases for Mutation Events (Tuesday, 9 June)
• to www-dom Re: [DOM3Events] Use cases for Mutation Events (Sunday, 7 June)
• Re: Progress Events normative text (Saturday, 30 May)
• Re: FW: Patent licensing and avoiding late Exclusions of Essential Claims in the WebApps WG (Saturday, 30 May)
• Re: [DOM L3] Telecon today? (Friday, 29 May)
• Re: [DOML3Events] ACTION-267 Proposal for event iterator (Wednesday, 29 April)
• Re: [DOML3Events] ACTION-267 Proposal for event iterator (Tuesday, 28 April)
• Re: [Selectors] Selectors to Proposed Rec - call for consensus (Wednesday, 15 April)
• New CfC Re: [Selectors API] Call for Consensus - approve John Resig's tests (Wednesday, 15 April)

Darin Adler

• Re: Handling too few arguments in method calls (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: Handling too few arguments in method calls (Monday, 22 June)

David Rogers

• BONDI Approved Release 1.0 (Thursday, 28 May)
• [widgets] <access> element (Thursday, 23 April)
• RE: [widget-digsig] Pls review: Additional considerations on elliptic curve algorithms to consider (Thursday, 23 April)

Dodger

• Re: [selectors-api] Names of querySelector() and querySelectorAll() methods (Friday, 19 June)

Dominique Hazael-Massieux

• Alpha Widget checker (Tuesday, 23 June)
• [widgets] conformance requirements review (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: Comments on Widgets spec (Monday, 15 June)
• Comments on Widgets spec (Friday, 12 June)

Doug Reeder

• HTML 5 Database Storage Does Not Enable Chaining Transactions (Saturday, 4 April)
• Re: HTML 5 Database Storage Does Not Enable Chaining Transactions (Thursday, 9 April)

Doug Schepers

• Re: Specs using Web IDL (Sunday, 28 June)
• Re: Specs using Web IDL (Sunday, 28 June)
• Re: Specs using Web IDL (Saturday, 27 June)
• Berkeley DB (was: Points of order on this WG) (Friday, 26 June)
• Re: Points of order on this WG (Friday, 26 June)
• Re: Points of order on this WG (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: Points of order on this WG (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: 'scroll' and 'resize' events (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Agenda:DOM3 Events Telcon (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Next DOM3 Events Telcon (Time and Day?) (Saturday, 6 June)
• Re: Mutation events replacement (Thursday, 4 June)
• [widgets] Open in Browser? (Tuesday, 26 May)
• Working Vacation (Tuesday, 5 May)
• Re: addEventListener naming (Friday, 24 April)
• Re: Web Storage Scope and Charter (Friday, 24 April)
• Re: Web Storage Scope and Charter (Friday, 24 April)
• Re: Web Storage Scope and Charter (Thursday, 23 April)
• Web Storage Scope and Charter (was: CfC: FPWD of Server-Sent Events, Web Sockets API, Web Storage, and Web Workers; deadline April 10) (Thursday, 23 April)
• Re: CfC: FPWD of Server-Sent Events, Web Sockets API, Web Storage, and Web Workers; deadline April 10 (Wednesday, 22 April)
• Reminder: DOM3 Events Telcon Canceled (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Request for Review: Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (Friday, 3 April)

Ennals, Robert

• Introduction: Rob Ennals from Intel (Tuesday, 26 May)

Erik Arvidsson

• Re: 'scroll' and 'resize' events (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: 'scroll' and 'resize' events (Thursday, 25 June)
• Input events, checkboxes and radio buttons (Friday, 19 June)
• Fwd: [whatwg] Exposing EventTarget to JavaScript (Friday, 24 April)

Felix Sasaki

• Re: [widgets] i18n proposals document (Thursday, 16 April)

Francois Daoust

• [widgets] Comments on Widgets 1.0: Packaging and configuration, 9.1 Processing rules (Sunday, 14 June)
• Re: [widgets] Base folder and resolution of relative paths (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: [widgets] Base folder and resolution of relative paths (Monday, 11 May)
• Re: [widgets] Base folder and resolution of relative paths (Monday, 27 April)

Frederick Hirsch

• Re: [cors] Additional Comments on 17 March 2009 cors draft (Tuesday, 30 June)
• [cors] Comments on 17 March 2009 (Tuesday, 30 June)
• Re: [widgets] dig sig RelaxNG schema (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: Reminder: Comments for LCWD of Widgets 1.0: Digital Signatures due June 1 (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: Reminder: Comments for LCWD of Widgets 1.0: Digital Signatures due June 1 (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: Widgets 1.0: Digital Signatures (Thursday, 4 June)
• Re: Reminder: Comments for LCWD of Widgets 1.0: Digital Signatures due June 1 (Thursday, 4 June)
• Re: [widgets] dig sig and requirements ready for pub! (Thursday, 7 May)
• [widgets-digsig] minor editorial update (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: [widgets] dig sig and requirements ready for pub! (Tuesday, 5 May)
• Re: [widgets] dig sig and requirements ready for pub! (Monday, 4 May)
• Re: [widgets] dig sig and requirements ready for pub! (Monday, 4 May)
• [widget-digsig] XML Signature Properties published (Thursday, 30 April)
• [widget-digsig] Update to widget signature (Wednesday, 29 April)
• Re: [widgets] Dig Sig review in prep for LC (Wednesday, 29 April)
• Re: [widgets] Dig Sig review in prep for LC (Wednesday, 29 April)
• Updates to Widget Signature (Tuesday, 28 April)
• Proposal to update signature text in Packaging and Config, remove from Widget Signature (Monday, 27 April)
• Re: [widget-digsig] Updated Widget Signature editors draft (Friday, 24 April)
• [widget-digsig] Updated Widget Signature editors draft (Friday, 24 April)
• Re: [widget-digsig] Pls review: Additional considerations on elliptic curve algorithms to consider (Thursday, 23 April)
• Re: [widgets] New WD of Widgets 1.0: Digital Signatures spec published on March 31 (Thursday, 23 April)
• Re: [widgets] New WD of Widgets 1.0: Digital Signatures spec published on March 31 (Wednesday, 22 April)
• [widget-digsig] updated Widget Signature editors draft (Wednesday, 22 April)
• Re: [widgets] New WD of Widgets 1.0: Digital Signatures spec published on March 31 (Wednesday, 22 April)
• Re: [widgets] Agenda for 23 April 2009 Voice Conference (Wednesday, 22 April)
• Re: [widgets] Agenda for 23 April 2009 Voice Conference (Wednesday, 22 April)
• Re: [widget] [widget-digsig] Comment on WD of Widgets 1.0: Digital Signatures - use of Created property (Tuesday, 21 April)
• Re: [widgets] New WD of Widgets 1.0: Digital Signatures spec published on March 31 (Tuesday, 21 April)
• Proposal for ISSUE-83 (Tuesday, 21 April)
• Re: [widgets] Jar signing vs. XML signatures (Wednesday, 15 April)
• Re: ISSUE-83 (digsig should not be read at runtime): Instantiated widget should not be able to read digital signature [Widgets] (Tuesday, 14 April)
• [widget-digsig] Pls review: Additional considerations on elliptic curve algorithms to consider (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: ISSUE-83 (digsig should not be read at runtime): Instantiated widget should not be able to read digital signature [Widgets] (Thursday, 2 April)

Garrett Smith

• Re: File API Feedback (Tuesday, 30 June)
• Re: File API Feedback (Tuesday, 30 June)
• Re: File API Feedback (Saturday, 27 June)
• Re: [PrototypeRoot] (Monday, 22 June)
• Re: [PrototypeRoot] (Saturday, 20 June)
• Re: [webidl] DOMString (Wednesday, 22 April)

Giovanni Campagna

• Re: [WebIDL] Callback, PropertyOnly, NoInterfaceObject (Tuesday, 30 June)
• Re: [WebIDL] Callback, PropertyOnly, NoInterfaceObject (Tuesday, 30 June)
• Re: File API Feedback (Saturday, 27 June)
• Re: File API Feedback (Friday, 19 June)
• Re: XHR without user credentials (Wednesday, 10 June)
• Re: CSRF: alternative solutions (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Re: CSRF: alternative solutions (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Re: CSRF: alternative solutions (Monday, 8 June)
• CSRF: alternative solutions (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: Mutation events replacement (Thursday, 4 June)
• Re: setTimeout() in HTML5 (Monday, 4 May)
• Re: setTimeout() in HTML5 (Monday, 4 May)
• Re: [webidl] Callback confusion (Wednesday, 29 April)
• Re: Web Storage & SQL (Thursday, 9 April)
• Re: Web Storage & SQL (Thursday, 9 April)
• Re: Web Storage & SQL (Thursday, 9 April)

Glen

• Re: [XHR] XMLHttpRequest name (Tuesday, 23 June)
• Re: [XHR] XMLHttpRequest name (Tuesday, 23 June)
• [XHR] XMLHttpRequest name (Tuesday, 23 June)

Henri Sivonen

• Re: [widgets] Please include a statement of purpose and user interaction expectations for <feature> (Tuesday, 23 June)
• Re: [widgets] Please include a statement of purpose and user interaction expectations for <feature> (Monday, 22 June)
• [widgets] Please include a statement of purpose and user interaction expectations for <feature> (Tuesday, 2 June)
• [widgets] What does it mean to have an unavailable API (Tuesday, 2 June)
• Re: [widgets] Purpose and utility of <feature> unclear (Tuesday, 2 June)
• Re: [widgets] Purpose and utility of <feature> unclear (Monday, 1 June)
• [widgets] Purpose and utility of <feature> unclear (Monday, 1 June)
• Re: [widgets] Public keys in widgets URI scheme? (Wednesday, 27 May)
• Re: [widgets] Widgets URI scheme... it's baaaack! (Friday, 22 May)
• Re: [widgets] Jar signing vs. XML signatures (Friday, 17 April)
• Re: [widgets] Jar signing vs. XML signatures (Thursday, 16 April)
• Re: [widgets] Jar signing vs. XML signatures (Wednesday, 15 April)
• Re: [widgets] Jar signing vs. XML signatures (Tuesday, 14 April)
• Re: [widgets] Jar signing vs. XML signatures (Tuesday, 14 April)
• Re: [widgets] Jar signing vs. XML signatures (Tuesday, 14 April)
• [widgets] Jar signing vs. XML signatures (Tuesday, 14 April)

Henry S. Thompson

• Re: [cors] TAG request concerning CORS & Next Step(s) (Wednesday, 24 June)

Hillebrand, Rainer

• RE: New Widgets A&E Editors Draft (Friday, 24 April)
• RE: [widgets] Screenshots and case sensitive file names (Tuesday, 21 April)

Ian Hickson

• Re: Web IDL syntax (Tuesday, 30 June)
• Re: File API Feedback (Tuesday, 30 June)
• Re: An import statement for Web IDL (Tuesday, 30 June)
• Re: An import statement for Web IDL (Tuesday, 30 June)
• Re: An import statement for Web IDL (Monday, 29 June)
• Re: XHR and sandboxed iframes (was: Re: XHR without user credentials) (Saturday, 27 June)
• Re: XHR and sandboxed iframes (was: Re: XHR without user credentials) (Friday, 26 June)
• Re: Points of order on this WG (Friday, 26 June)
• Re: Points of order on this WG (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: Why I don't attend the weekly teleconference (Was: Input on the agenda) (Wednesday, 24 June)
• Re: [cors] Review (Tuesday, 23 June)
• Re: [PrototypeRoot] (Monday, 22 June)
• Re: [cors] Review (Monday, 22 June)
• Re: [PrototypeRoot] (Saturday, 20 June)
• Re: [PrototypeRoot] (Saturday, 20 June)
• Re: [PrototypeRoot] (Saturday, 20 June)
• Re: File API Feedback (Friday, 19 June)
• Re: [selectors-api] Transitioning to CR (Friday, 19 June)
• Re: Web IDL syntax (Friday, 19 June)
• Re: File API Feedback (Friday, 19 June)
• Re: File API Feedback (Thursday, 18 June)
• Re: XHR and sandboxed iframes (was: Re: XHR without user credentials) (Thursday, 18 June)
• Re: [cors] Review (Thursday, 18 June)
• Re: XHR and sandboxed iframes (was: Re: XHR without user credentials) (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: [cors] Review (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: XHR and sandboxed iframes (was: Re: XHR without user credentials) (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: [cors] Review (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: [cors] Review (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: XHR and sandboxed iframes (was: Re: XHR without user credentials) (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: XHR and sandboxed iframes (was: Re: XHR without user credentials) (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Interaction events (Was: 'scroll' and 'resize' events) (Wednesday, 17 June)
• 'scroll' and 'resize' events (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: [WebIDL] double (Monday, 15 June)
• Re: [WebIDL] double (Monday, 15 June)
• Re: [WebIDL] double (Sunday, 14 June)
• Re: "send data using the Web Socket" and UCS-2 (Friday, 12 June)
• Re: [webworkers] Tasks (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: EventSource editorial issues (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: WebStorage feedback (Wednesday, 10 June)
• Re: WebSocket question (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Re: [webidl] XMLHttpRequest interface object (Friday, 5 June)
• Re: review of A&E (Thursday, 4 June)
• Re: HTML 5 Database Storage Does Not Enable Chaining Transactions (Wednesday, 3 June)
• Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header? (Wednesday, 3 June)
• Re: setTimeout() in HTML5 (Monday, 4 May)
• Re: setTimeout() in HTML5 (Monday, 4 May)
• setTimeout() in HTML5 (Monday, 4 May)
• Re: [webidl] XMLHttpRequest interface object (Thursday, 30 April)
• Re: Storage 'length' and enumeration (Thursday, 30 April)
• Re: Storage 'length' and enumeration (Thursday, 30 April)
• Re: Storage 'length' and enumeration (Thursday, 30 April)
• Re: Storage 'length' and enumeration (Thursday, 30 April)
• Re: WebStorage feedback (Wednesday, 29 April)
• Re: Storage 'length' and enumeration (Wednesday, 29 April)
• Re: Storage 'length' and enumeration (Wednesday, 29 April)
• WebStorage feedback (Wednesday, 29 April)
• Re: Storage 'length' and enumeration (Wednesday, 29 April)
• [NameCreator] definition buggy (Wednesday, 29 April)
• Re: Storage 'length' and enumeration (Wednesday, 29 April)
• Re: Storage 'length' and enumeration (Tuesday, 28 April)
• Re: Storage 'length' and enumeration (Tuesday, 28 April)
• Re: DOM3 Events call today/tonight? (Sunday, 26 April)
• Re: Proposal for addition to WebStorage (Friday, 24 April)
• Re: Web Storage Scope and Charter (Friday, 24 April)
• Re: Web Storage Scope and Charter (Friday, 24 April)
• Re: Web Storage Scope and Charter (Thursday, 23 April)
• Re: Web Storage Scope and Charter (was: CfC: FPWD of Server-Sent Events, Web Sockets API, Web Storage, and Web Workers; deadline April 10) (Thursday, 23 April)
• Re: New CfC Re: [Selectors API] Call for Consensus - approve John Resig's tests (Wednesday, 15 April)
• Re: Web Storage & SQL (Friday, 10 April)
• Re: CfC: FPWD of Server-Sent Events, Web Sockets API, Web Storage, and Web Workers; deadline April 10 (Friday, 10 April)
• Re: Web Storage & SQL (Thursday, 9 April)
• Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header? (Thursday, 9 April)
• Re: CfC: FPWD of Server-Sent Events, Web Sockets API, Web Storage, and Web Workers; deadline April 10 (Thursday, 2 April)
• Re: Request for FPWD publication of Server-Sent Events, Web Sockets API, Web Storage, and Web Workers (Thursday, 2 April)
• Request for FPWD publication of Server-Sent Events, Web Sockets API, Web Storage, and Web Workers (Wednesday, 1 April)

Ivan Enderlin @ Hoa

• Re: Web Storage & SQL (Friday, 10 April)
• [Fwd: Re: Web Storage & SQL] (Thursday, 9 April)
• Re: Web Storage & SQL (Thursday, 9 April)

ivan.demarino@orange-ftgroup.com

• London F2F invitation (Monday, 1 June)
• RE: [widgets] window modes in P&C, was Re: Small question aboutlatestversionof "P&C specs" (11th Mar 2009) (Monday, 11 May)
• RE: [widgets] window modes in P&C, was Re: Small question aboutlatestversion of "P&C specs" (11th Mar 2009) (Monday, 11 May)
• RE: [widgets] window modes in P&C, was Re: Small question about latestversion of "P&C specs" (11th Mar 2009) (Monday, 11 May)
• RE: [Proposal] Empowering the Widget to ask fro "mode change" in A&E (Friday, 24 April)

Jean-Claude Dufourd

• Re: [widgets] [preference element] question on the value attribute (Wednesday, 24 June)
• [widgets] [preference element] question on the value attribute (Tuesday, 23 June)
• Re: [widgets] Widgets URI scheme... it's baaaack! (Wednesday, 27 May)
• Re: [widgets] Widgets URI scheme... it's baaaack! (Tuesday, 26 May)

Jeff Decker

• Widgets 1.0: Packaging and Configuration questions (Wednesday, 17 June)

Jeff Walden

• "send data using the Web Socket" and UCS-2 (Tuesday, 2 June)

Jere.Kapyaho@nokia.com

• Re: [widgets] P&C LC comments on I18N/L10N (Tuesday, 30 June)
• Re: [widgets] P&C LC, general comments (Monday, 29 June)
• Re: [widgets] P&C LC, general comments (Thursday, 4 June)
• [widgets] P&C LC, general comments (Wednesday, 3 June)
• [widgets] P&C LC comments on I18N/L10N (Wednesday, 3 June)
• Re: [widgets] Base folder and resolution of relative paths (Wednesday, 13 May)
• Re: [widgets] Base folder and resolution of relative paths (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: I18N issue: case-sensitivity of locale subdirectories (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: Widgets 1.0 Packaging and Configuration: I18N comments... (Thursday, 16 April)
• Re: [widgets] Zip endian issue? (Friday, 3 April)

Jeremy Orlow

• Re: Points of order on this WG (Friday, 26 June)

John J Barton

• Re: Storage 'length' and enumeration (Thursday, 30 April)
• Re: Storage 'length' and enumeration (Wednesday, 29 April)
• Re: Storage 'length' and enumeration (Wednesday, 29 April)
• Re: Storage 'length' and enumeration (Wednesday, 29 April)
• Re: Storage 'length' and enumeration (Tuesday, 28 April)

John J. Barton

• Re: Storage 'length' and enumeration (Thursday, 30 April)
• Re: Storage 'length' and enumeration (Thursday, 30 April)
• Re: Storage 'length' and enumeration (Wednesday, 29 April)
• Re: Storage 'length' and enumeration (Wednesday, 29 April)
• Re: Storage 'length' and enumeration (Wednesday, 29 April)
• Storage 'length' and enumeration (Tuesday, 28 April)

Jon Ferraiolo

• Re: Request for Review: Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (Friday, 3 April)

Jonas Sicking

• Re: File API Feedback (Tuesday, 30 June)
• Re: File API Feedback (Tuesday, 30 June)
• Re: Berkeley DB license (was Re: Points of order on this WG) (Friday, 26 June)
• Re: Points of order on this WG (Friday, 26 June)
• Re: Berkeley DB (was: Points of order on this WG) (Friday, 26 June)
• Re: Handling too few arguments in method calls (Friday, 26 June)
• Re: Points of order on this WG (Friday, 26 June)
• Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header? (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header? (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: [cors] TAG request concerning CORS & Next Step(s) (Wednesday, 24 June)
• Re: [cors] TAG request concerning CORS & Next Step(s) (Wednesday, 24 June)
• Re: [cors] TAG request concerning CORS & Next Step(s) (Wednesday, 24 June)
• Re: [cors] TAG request concerning CORS & Next Step(s) (Wednesday, 24 June)
• Re: Handling too few arguments in method calls (Tuesday, 23 June)
• Re: File API Feedback (Friday, 19 June)
• Re: Progress Events normative text (Thursday, 18 June)
• Re: XBL2 Status? (Tuesday, 16 June)
• Re: XHR without user credentials (Sunday, 14 June)
• Re: Redirect and Origin (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Re: XHR without user credentials (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Re: XHR without user credentials (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Re: Mutation events replacement (Thursday, 4 June)
• Re: Mutation events replacement (Thursday, 4 June)
• Re: Mutation events replacement (Thursday, 4 June)
• Re: Mutation events replacement (Thursday, 4 June)
• Re: Mutation events replacement (Thursday, 4 June)
• Re: [DOM3Events] Use cases for Mutation Events (Thursday, 4 June)
• Re: Mutation events replacement (Thursday, 4 June)
• Re: [DOM3Events] Use cases for Mutation Events (Thursday, 4 June)
• Re: Mutation events replacement (Thursday, 4 June)
• Mutation events replacement (Thursday, 4 June)
• Re: "send data using the Web Socket" and UCS-2 (Thursday, 4 June)
• Re: [widgets] What does it mean to have an unavailable API (Thursday, 4 June)
• Re: [widgets] What does it mean to have an unavailable API (Tuesday, 2 June)
• Re: [cors] Redirects (Thursday, 14 May)
• Re: Require that XPathNSResolver be implemented on Node (Tuesday, 12 May)
• Re: I18N issue: case-sensitivity of locale subdirectories (Friday, 1 May)
• Re: [webidl] definition of const string literal (Wednesday, 29 April)
• Re: [webstorage] inactive documents (Tuesday, 28 April)
• Re: [DOML3Events] ACTION-267 Proposal for event iterator (Tuesday, 28 April)
• Re: [webstorage] inactive documents (Monday, 27 April)
• Re: Web Storage Scope and Charter (was: CfC: FPWD of Server-Sent Events, Web Sockets API, Web Storage, and Web Workers; deadline April 10) (Thursday, 23 April)
• Re: [cors] Redirects (Thursday, 23 April)
• Re: [cors] Redirects (Thursday, 23 April)
• Re: CfC: FPWD of Server-Sent Events, Web Sockets API, Web Storage, and Web Workers; deadline April 10 (Tuesday, 21 April)
• Re: Web Storage & SQL (Friday, 17 April)
• Re: [widgets] Jar signing vs. XML signatures (Wednesday, 15 April)
• Re: Web Storage & SQL (Saturday, 11 April)
• Re: Web Storage & SQL (Thursday, 9 April)
• Re: [cors] security issue with XMLHttpRequest API compatibility (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: [cors] security issue with XMLHttpRequest API compatibility (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: [cors] security issue with XMLHttpRequest API compatibility (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: [cors] security issue with XMLHttpRequest API compatibility (Tuesday, 7 April)
• Re: [widgets] dropping Asynchronous HTTP Requests and Storage (Tuesday, 7 April)
• Re: [cors] security issue with XMLHttpRequest API compatibility (Tuesday, 7 April)
• Re: [cors] security issue with XMLHttpRequest API compatibility (Tuesday, 7 April)
• Re: [cors] security issue with XMLHttpRequest API compatibility (Monday, 6 April)
• Re: [cors] security issue with XMLHttpRequest API compatibility (Monday, 6 April)
• Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header? (Friday, 3 April)
• Re: CfC: FPWD of Server-Sent Events, Web Sockets API, Web Storage, and Web Workers; deadline April 10 (Thursday, 2 April)

Jonathan Rees

• Re: Origin enables XSS to escalate to XSRF (was: security issue with XMLHttpRequest API compatibility) (Thursday, 11 June)

João Eiras

• [webstorage] deleting a database (Tuesday, 30 June)
• Re: Mutation events replacement (Thursday, 4 June)
• Re: [DOM3Events] Use cases for Mutation Events (Thursday, 4 June)
• Re: [DOM3Events] Use cases for Mutation Events (Thursday, 4 June)
• Re: Mutation events replacement (Thursday, 4 June)
• Re: WebStorage feedback (Monday, 18 May)
• Re: [DOML3Events] ACTION-267 Proposal for event iterator (Tuesday, 28 April)
• Re: [webstorage] inactive documents (Monday, 27 April)
• [webstorage] readTransaction clarification (Tuesday, 7 April)

Kai Hendry

• Re: [widgets] dig sig RelaxNG schema (Friday, 26 June)
• Re: [widgets] dig sig RelaxNG schema (Friday, 26 June)
• [widgets] dig sig RelaxNG schema (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: [widgets] dig sig and requirements ready for pub! (Friday, 8 May)
• Re: [widgets] dig sig and requirements ready for pub! (Tuesday, 5 May)
• Re: [widgets] dig sig and requirements ready for pub! (Friday, 1 May)

Kris Zyp

• Re: Web Storage & SQL (Thursday, 9 April)
• Re: Web Storage & SQL (Thursday, 9 April)
• Re: Web Storage & SQL (Wednesday, 8 April)

Kruessel, Steffen

• RE: [WebIDL] Callback, PropertyOnly, NoInterfaceObject (Tuesday, 30 June)
• RE: [WebIDL] Callback, PropertyOnly, NoInterfaceObject (Tuesday, 30 June)

Krzysztof Maczy�ski

• Widgets 1.0: Packaging and Configuration LCWD review (Sunday, 21 June)

L. David Baron

• [WebIDL] Bugs in DOMString conversion to Unichode characters (was Re: "send data using the Web Socket" and UCS-2) (Tuesday, 30 June)
• Re: Berkeley DB license (was Re: Points of order on this WG) (Friday, 26 June)
• Re: Points of order on this WG (Friday, 26 June)

Lachlan Hunt

• Re: Exit criteria Re: [selectors-api] Transitioning to CR (Wednesday, 24 June)
• Re: [selectors-api] Transitioning to CR (Friday, 19 June)
• [selectors-api] Transitioning to CR (Wednesday, 17 June)
• [webstorage] Ambiguous Requirement for Key Ordering (Tuesday, 9 June)

Larry Masinter

• RE: [widgets] Widgets URI scheme... it's baaaack! (Friday, 29 May)
• RE: [widgets] Widgets URI scheme... it's baaaack! (Friday, 22 May)
• RE: [widgets] Widgets URI scheme... it's baaaack! (Friday, 22 May)

Laurens Holst

• Require that XPathNSResolver be implemented on Node (Friday, 8 May)

Maciej Stachowiak

• Re: An import statement for Web IDL (Tuesday, 30 June)
• Re: An import statement for Web IDL (Tuesday, 30 June)
• Re: Points of order on this WG (Saturday, 27 June)
• Re: Points of order on this WG (Saturday, 27 June)
• Re: Berkeley DB license (was Re: Points of order on this WG) (Saturday, 27 June)
• Re: Berkeley DB license (was Re: Points of order on this WG) (Friday, 26 June)
• Re: Points of order on this WG (Friday, 26 June)
• Re: Points of order on this WG (Friday, 26 June)
• Re: Points of order on this WG (Friday, 26 June)
• Re: Points of order on this WG (Friday, 26 June)
• Re: Points of order on this WG (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: Points of order on this WG (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: [cors] TAG request concerning CORS & Next Step(s) (Wednesday, 24 June)
• Re: [selectors-api] Transitioning to CR (Saturday, 20 June)
• EventSource editorial issues (Sunday, 24 May)
• Re: Web Storage & SQL (Friday, 10 April)
• Re: Web Storage & SQL (Thursday, 9 April)

Marcin Hanclik

• [WebIDL] grammar in ABNF (Tuesday, 30 June)
• RE: Feature names: Typo in example (Monday, 29 June)
• [widgets] P&C comments, 8 (Monday, 29 June)
• RE: Points of order on this WG (Friday, 26 June)
• RE: [WebIDL] Callback, PropertyOnly, NoInterfaceObject (Friday, 26 June)
• RE: Points of order on this WG (Friday, 26 June)
• [WebIDL] Callback, PropertyOnly, NoInterfaceObject (Thursday, 25 June)
• RE: Web IDL syntax (Friday, 19 June)
• RE: [widgets] RE: P&C Last Call comments 1..7+ (Thursday, 18 June)
• [widgets] RE: P&C Last Call comments 1..7+ (Thursday, 18 June)
• RE: [widgets] P&C Last Call comments, 7 (Wednesday, 17 June)
• RE: [P&C] Definitions: installation, instantiation (Wednesday, 17 June)
• RE: [widgets] P&C Last Call comments, zip-rel-path ABNF (Wednesday, 17 June)
• [P&C] Definitions: installation, instantiation (Wednesday, 17 June)
• RE: [widgets] P&C Last Call comments, interoperability (Tuesday, 16 June)
• RE: [widgets] P&C Last Call comments, interoperability (Tuesday, 16 June)
• RE: [widgets] P&C Last Call comments, versioning (Tuesday, 16 June)
• RE: [WebIDL] double (Wednesday, 10 June)
• [WebIDL] double (Wednesday, 10 June)
• RE: [WebIDL] "module" in ECMAScript (Wednesday, 10 June)
• RE: [WebIDL] "module" in ECMAScript (Tuesday, 9 June)
• RE: [widgets] P&C Last Call comments, 7 (Tuesday, 9 June)
• RE: [widgets] What does it mean to have an unavailable API (Tuesday, 9 June)
• RE: [widgets] What does it mean to have an unavailable API (Tuesday, 9 June)
• RE: [widgets] What does it mean to have an unavailable API (Tuesday, 9 June)
• RE: Reminder: Comments for LCWD of Widgets 1.0: Digital Signatures due June 1 (Monday, 8 June)
• RE: [widgets] What does it mean to have an unavailable API (Friday, 5 June)
• Automated API specification generation (Thursday, 4 June)
• RE: [widgets] What does it mean to have an unavailable API (Thursday, 4 June)
• RE: [widgets] P&C Last Call comments, zip-rel-path ABNF (Thursday, 4 June)
• RE: [widgets] What does it mean to have an unavailable API (Thursday, 4 June)
• RE: [widgets] What does it mean to have an unavailable API (Thursday, 4 June)
• RE: [widgets] P&C Last Call comments, viewmodes, referencing other specs, guarantee of consistency (Thursday, 4 June)
• RE: [widgets] P&C Last Call comments, viewmodes, referencing other specs, guarantee of consistency (Wednesday, 3 June)
• [widgets] P&C Last Call comments, viewmodes, referencing other specs, guarantee of consistency (Wednesday, 3 June)
• RE: [widgets] What does it mean to have an unavailable API (Wednesday, 3 June)
• RE: [widgets] What does it mean to have an unavailable API (Wednesday, 3 June)
• RE: [widgets] What does it mean to have an unavailable API (Wednesday, 3 June)
• RE: [widgets] P&C Last Call comments, 3 (Tuesday, 2 June)
• [widgets] P&C Last Call comments, 7 (Tuesday, 2 June)
• RE: [widgets] What does it mean to have an unavailable API (Tuesday, 2 June)
• RE: [widgets] What does it mean to have an unavailable API (Tuesday, 2 June)
• RE: [widgets] P&C Last Call comments, 4 (Tuesday, 2 June)
• [widgets] P&C Last Call comments, 6 (Tuesday, 2 June)
• RE: [widgets] P&C Last Call comments, 4 (Tuesday, 2 June)
• RE: [widgets] Purpose and utility of <feature> unclear (Tuesday, 2 June)
• RE: [widgets] P&C Last Call comments, interoperability (Tuesday, 2 June)
• RE: [widgets] P&C Last Call comments, 3 (Tuesday, 2 June)
• RE: [widgets] P&C Last Call comments, versioning (Tuesday, 2 June)
• RE: [widgets] P&C Last Call comments, versioning (Tuesday, 2 June)
• RE: [widgets] P&C Last Call comments, versioning (Tuesday, 2 June)
• RE: [widgets] P&C Last Call comments, 1 (Tuesday, 2 June)
• [widgets] P&C Last Call comments, 5 (Sunday, 31 May)
• [widgets] P&C Last Call comments, zip-rel-path ABNF (Sunday, 31 May)
• [widgets] P&C Last Call comments, 2 (Sunday, 31 May)
• [widgets] P&C Last Call comments, 4 (Sunday, 31 May)
• [widgets] P&C Last Call comments, 1 (Sunday, 31 May)
• [widgets] P&C Last Call comments, interoperability (Sunday, 31 May)
• [widgets] P&C Last Call comments, 3 (Sunday, 31 May)
• [widgets] P&C Last Call comments, versioning (Sunday, 31 May)
• [widgets] P&C Last Call comments, 0 (Sunday, 31 May)
• RE: Feature names: Typo in example (Friday, 29 May)
• Feature names: Typo in example (Friday, 29 May)
• [WebIDL] "module" in ECMAScript (Friday, 29 May)
• RE: [widgets] Agenda for 14 May 2009 Voice Conference (Wednesday, 13 May)
• RE: [widgets] Draft Agenda for 30 April 2009 Voice Conference (Thursday, 30 April)
• RE: [widgets] Draft Agenda for 30 April 2009 Voice Conference (Thursday, 30 April)

Marcos Caceres

• Re: http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/#reserved-file-and-folder-names (Tuesday, 30 June)
• Re: A+E todo (Tuesday, 30 June)
• Re: [widgets] Verify Zip archive (Tuesday, 30 June)
• Re: [widgets] Rule for finding a file within a widget package (Tuesday, 30 June)
• Re: [widgets] Rule for Identifying the media type of a file (Tuesday, 30 June)
• Re: Widgets PAG seeks feedback on Widget Updates spec (Tuesday, 30 June)
• Re: [widgets] editorial style (Monday, 29 June)
• RE: [widgets] P&C LC#2 comment regarding icons (Monday, 29 June)
• Re: [widgets] Rule for extracting file data from a file entry (Monday, 29 June)
• Re: [widgets] Editorial: 9x Processing (Monday, 29 June)
• Re: [widgets] P&C LC#2 comment regarding icons (Monday, 29 June)
• Re: [widgets] P&C LC comments on I18N/L10N (Monday, 29 June)
• Re: Feature names: Typo in example (Monday, 29 June)
• Re: [widgets] [preference element] question on the value attribute (Wednesday, 24 June)
• Re: [widgets] Draft Agenda for 25 June 2009 Voice Conference (Wednesday, 24 June)
• Re: Request for comments: Delivery Context Ontology Last Call; Deadline 7 Aug 2009 (Tuesday, 23 June)
• Re: [widgets] [preference element] question on the value attribute (Tuesday, 23 June)
• Re: widgets spec (Thursday, 18 June)
• Re: [widgets] RE: P&C Last Call comments 1..7+ (Thursday, 18 June)
• Re: [widgets] P&C Last Call comments, 7 (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: [widgets] Draft Minutes from 10 June 2009 f2f meeting (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: Comments on Widgets spec (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: [P&C] Definitions: installation, instantiation (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: [P&C] Definitions: installation, instantiation (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: [widgets] P&C Last Call comments, zip-rel-path ABNF (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: [widgets] Public keys in widgets URI scheme? (Wednesday, 17 June)
• [widgets] P&C Last Call Period (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: [widgets] P&C LC, general comments (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: [widgets] P&C LC, general comments (Tuesday, 16 June)
• Re: [widgets] P&C Last Call comments, viewmodes, referencing other specs, guarantee of consistency (Tuesday, 16 June)
• Re: [widgets] Please include a statement of purpose and user interaction expectations for <feature> (Tuesday, 16 June)
• Re: [widgets] P&C Last Call comments, interoperability (Tuesday, 16 June)
• Re: [widgets] P&C Last Call comments, 3 (Tuesday, 16 June)
• Re: [widgets] P&C Last Call comments, interoperability (Tuesday, 16 June)
• Re: [widgets] P&C Last Call comments, versioning (Tuesday, 16 June)
• [widgets] Last Call Comments (Monday, 15 June)
• Re: [widgets] Rule for finding a file within a widget package (Wednesday, 10 June)
• Re: [widgets] What does it mean to have an unavailable API (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Re: [widgets] What does it mean to have an unavailable API (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Re: [widgets] What does it mean to have an unavailable API (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Re: [widgets] What does it mean to have an unavailable API (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Re: [widgets] What does it mean to have an unavailable API (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: [widgets] What does it mean to have an unavailable API (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: [widgets] P&C Last Call comments, 7 (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: [widgets] What does it mean to have an unavailable API (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: [widgets] What does it mean to have an unavailable API (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: [widgets] What does it mean to have an unavailable API (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: [widgets] Access Requests Use Case: Restricted access to remote web services using white/black lists (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: [widgets] What does it mean to have an unavailable API (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: I18N issue: case-sensitivity of locale subdirectories (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: [widgets] What does it mean to have an unavailable API (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: [widgets] Implementing Google Wave with W3C Widgets (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: [widgets] Getting A&E spec to Last Call (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: Storage and widgets (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: Reminder: Comments for LCWD of Widgets 1.0: Digital Signatures due June 1 (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: Reminder: Comments for LCWD of Widgets 1.0: Digital Signatures due June 1 (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: Widgets 1.0: Digital Signatures (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: [widgets] Moving Widgets 1.0: Digital Signature spec to Candidate Recommendation (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: [widgets] P&C Last Call comments, viewmodes, referencing other specs, guarantee of consistency (Wednesday, 3 June)
• Re: [widgets] P&C Last Call comments, viewmodes, referencing other specs, guarantee of consistency (Wednesday, 3 June)
• Re: [widgets] P&C LC, general comments (Wednesday, 3 June)
• Re: [widgets] What does it mean to have an unavailable API (Tuesday, 2 June)
• Re: [widgets] P&C Last Call comments, 7 (Tuesday, 2 June)
• Re: [widgets] P&C Last Call comments, 3 (Tuesday, 2 June)
• Re: [widgets] P&C Last Call comments, 6 (Tuesday, 2 June)
• Re: [widgets] P&C Last Call comments, 4 (Tuesday, 2 June)
• Re: [widgets] What does it mean to have an unavailable API (Tuesday, 2 June)
• Re: [widgets] P&C Last Call comments, 4 (Tuesday, 2 June)
• Re: [widgets] Purpose and utility of <feature> unclear (Tuesday, 2 June)
• Re: [widgets] P&C Last Call comments, 1 (Tuesday, 2 June)
• Re: [widgets] P&C Last Call comments, versioning (Tuesday, 2 June)
• Re: [widgets] P&C Last Call comments, interoperability (Tuesday, 2 June)
• Re: [widgets] P&C Last Call comments, versioning (Tuesday, 2 June)
• Re: [widgets] P&C Last Call comments, zip-rel-path ABNF (Monday, 1 June)
• Re: [widgets] Purpose and utility of <feature> unclear (Monday, 1 June)
• Re: [widgets] P&C Last Call comments, interoperability (Monday, 1 June)
• Re: [widgets] Purpose and utility of <feature> unclear (Monday, 1 June)
• Re: [widgets] P&C Last Call comments, 3 (Monday, 1 June)
• Re: [widgets] P&C Last Call comments, versioning (Monday, 1 June)
• Re: [widgets] P&C Last Call comments, 2 (Monday, 1 June)
• Re: [widgets] P&C Last Call comments, 1 (Monday, 1 June)
• Re: [widgets] P&C Last Call comments, 5 (Monday, 1 June)
• Re: [widgets] P&C Last Call comments, versioning (Monday, 1 June)
• Re: Feature names: Typo in example (Friday, 29 May)
• Re: Feature names: Typo in example (Friday, 29 May)
• [widgets] Packaging call for review (Wednesday, 27 May)
• Re: [widget] Security model (Monday, 25 May)
• Re: [widget] Security model (Monday, 25 May)
• Re: [widget] Security model (Sunday, 24 May)
• Re: [widgets] i18n proposals document (Friday, 22 May)
• Re: [widgets] Call for Input: Use Cases and Requirements for Widgets Access Request spec (Friday, 22 May)
• Re: [widgets] Call for Input: Use Cases and Requirements for Widgets Access Request spec (Friday, 22 May)
• [widgets] Widgets URI scheme... it's baaaack! (Friday, 22 May)
• Re: More complete draft for Widgets: Access Requests (Thursday, 21 May)
• Re: [widgets] Draft Minutes from 14 May 2009 Voice Conference (Wednesday, 20 May)
• Re: FPWD for WAR? (Wednesday, 20 May)
• [widgets] P&C and window modes (Wednesday, 20 May)
• Re: FPWD for WAR? (Wednesday, 20 May)
• [widgets] Declaring *W*A*R* (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: [widget] Security model (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: [widget] Security model (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: [widgets] Draft Minutes from 14 May 2009 Voice Conference (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: [widget] Security model (Tuesday, 19 May)
• [widget] Security model (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: [widgets] Base folder and resolution of relative paths (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: [widgets] Draft Minutes from 14 May 2009 Voice Conference (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: [widgets] window modes in P&C, was Re: Small question aboutlatestversion of "P&C specs" (11th Mar 2009) (Monday, 11 May)
• [widgets] window modes in P&C, was Re: Small question about latest version of "P&C specs" (11th Mar 2009) (Friday, 8 May)
• [widgets] i18n feedback (Thursday, 7 May)
• [widgets] P&C to do list (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Re: [widgets] dig sig and requirements ready for pub! (Tuesday, 5 May)
• Re: [widgets] dig sig and requirements ready for pub! (Tuesday, 5 May)
• Re: [widgets] dig sig and requirements ready for pub! (Tuesday, 5 May)
• Re: [widgets] dig sig and requirements ready for pub! (Tuesday, 5 May)
• Re: I18N issue: case-sensitivity of locale subdirectories (Tuesday, 5 May)
• Re: [widgets] dig sig and requirements ready for pub! (Monday, 4 May)
• Re: [widgets] Comments to <access> element text (Saturday, 2 May)
• Re: Widget instances and widget invocations (Friday, 1 May)
• Re: Widget instances and widget invocations (Friday, 1 May)
• Re: Widget instances and widget invocations (Friday, 1 May)
• Re: [widgets] Comments to <access> element text (Friday, 1 May)
• Re: I18N proposals document review... (Friday, 1 May)
• Re: Proposal to update signature text in Packaging and Config, remove from Widget Signature (Friday, 1 May)
• Re: New Widgets A&E Editors Draft (Friday, 1 May)
• Re: review of A&E (Friday, 1 May)
• [widgets] dig sig and requirements ready for pub! (Wednesday, 29 April)
• [widgets] Requirements doc overhaul (Wednesday, 29 April)
• Re: [widgets] Dig Sig review in prep for LC (Wednesday, 29 April)
• Re: [widgets] Dig Sig review in prep for LC (Wednesday, 29 April)
• Re: [widgets] Dig Sig review in prep for LC (Wednesday, 29 April)
• [widgets] Dig Sig review in prep for LC (Wednesday, 29 April)
• Re: Proposal to update signature text in Packaging and Config, remove from Widget Signature (Monday, 27 April)
• Re: [widgets] Publishing LCWD of Widgets Digital Signatures and new WD of Requirements (Monday, 27 April)
• Re: [Proposal] Empowering the Widget to ask fro "mode change" in A&E (Friday, 24 April)
• Re: [Proposal] Empowering the Widget to ask fro "mode change" in A&E (Friday, 24 April)
• Re: Storage and widgets (Friday, 24 April)
• Re: review of A&E (Friday, 24 April)
• Re: Storage and widgets (Friday, 24 April)
• Re: [widget-digsig] Updated Widget Signature editors draft (Friday, 24 April)
• Re: review of A&E (Thursday, 23 April)
• Re: [widget-digsig] Pls review: Additional considerations on elliptic curve algorithms to consider (Thursday, 23 April)
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-83 (Thursday, 23 April)
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-83 (Thursday, 23 April)
• Re: Small question about latest version of "P&C specs" (11th Mar 2009) (Wednesday, 22 April)
• Re: [widgets] Agenda for 23 April 2009 Voice Conference (Wednesday, 22 April)
• Re: [widgets] Agenda for 23 April 2009 Voice Conference (Wednesday, 22 April)
• Re: [widget] [widget-digsig] Comment on WD of Widgets 1.0: Digital Signatures - use of Created property (Wednesday, 22 April)
• Re: [widgets] New WD of Widgets 1.0: Digital Signatures spec published on March 31 (Wednesday, 22 April)
• Re: Widgets 1.0 Packaging and Configuration: I18N comments... (Tuesday, 21 April)
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-83 (Tuesday, 21 April)
• Re: New Widgets A&E Editors Draft (Monday, 20 April)
• Re: [widgets] remove update related methods form A&E (Monday, 20 April)
• Re: [widgets] Screenshots and case sensitive file names (Monday, 20 April)
• Re: [widgets] restrictions on XML base (Monday, 20 April)
• Re: [Widgets] Widget Gallery RSS like sharing format (Monday, 20 April)
• Re: [widgets] Base folder and resolution of relative paths (Monday, 20 April)
• Re: [widgets] dropping screenshot (Sunday, 19 April)
• Re: [widgets] i18n proposals document (Friday, 17 April)
• Re: [widgets] i18n proposals document (Friday, 17 April)
• Re: [widgets] Jar signing vs. XML signatures (Friday, 17 April)
• [widgets] i18n proposals document (Thursday, 16 April)
• [widgets] dropping screenshot (Thursday, 16 April)
• Re: [widgets] Jar signing vs. XML signatures (Wednesday, 15 April)
• Re: [widgets] Jar signing vs. XML signatures (Tuesday, 14 April)
• Re: [widgets] Jar signing vs. XML signatures (Tuesday, 14 April)
• Re: [widgets] Jar signing vs. XML signatures (Tuesday, 14 April)
• Re: Simple approach for <access> (Tuesday, 14 April)
• Re: ISSUE-83 (digsig should not be read at runtime): Instantiated widget should not be able to read digital signature [Widgets] (Monday, 13 April)
• Re: ISSUE-83 (digsig should not be read at runtime): Instantiated widget should not be able to read digital signature [Widgets] (Thursday, 9 April)
• Re: ISSUE-83 (digsig should not be read at runtime): Instantiated widget should not be able to read digital signature [Widgets] (Thursday, 9 April)
• [widgets] blog post on recent Dig Sig spec (Thursday, 9 April)
• Re: Reminder: January 31 comment deadline for LCWD of Widgets 1.0: Packaging & Configuration spec (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: [widgets] Zip endian issue? (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: [widgets] dropping Asynchronous HTTP Requests and Storage (Tuesday, 7 April)
• [widgets] remove update related methods form A&E (Monday, 6 April)
• [widgets] dropping Asynchronous HTTP Requests and Storage (Monday, 6 April)
• Re: Widgets 1.0 Packaging and Configuration: I18N comments... (Friday, 3 April)
• Re: Widgets 1.0 Packaging and Configuration: I18N comments... (Friday, 3 April)
• [widgets] Zip endian issue? (Friday, 3 April)
• [widgets] <update> element (Friday, 3 April)
• Re: Widget Packaging and configuration LC review (Friday, 3 April)
• Re: Request for FPWD publication of Server-Sent Events, Web Sockets API, Web Storage, and Web Workers (Thursday, 2 April)

Mark Baker

• Re: [widgets] Widgets URI scheme... it's baaaack! (Saturday, 23 May)
• Re: [widgets] Widgets URI scheme... it's baaaack! (Saturday, 23 May)
• Re: [widgets] Widgets URI scheme... it's baaaack! (Saturday, 23 May)
• Re: [widgets] Widgets URI scheme... it's baaaack! (Friday, 22 May)
• Re: [widgets] Widgets URI scheme... it's baaaack! (Friday, 22 May)
• Re: [widgets] Widgets URI scheme... it's baaaack! (Friday, 22 May)

Mark Davis

• Re: [widgets] i18n proposals document (Thursday, 16 April)

Mark Nottingham

• Re: [cors] Web application (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: [cors] Review (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: [cors] Review (Tuesday, 16 June)
• Re: [cors] Review (Monday, 15 June)
• Re: [cors] Review (Sunday, 14 June)
• Re: [cors] Review (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Re: [cors] Review (Tuesday, 2 June)
• [cors] Review (Friday, 29 May)

Mark S. Miller

• Re: [cors] TAG request concerning CORS & Next Step(s) (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: [cors] TAG request concerning CORS & Next Step(s) (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: [cors] TAG request concerning CORS & Next Step(s) (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: [cors] TAG request concerning CORS & Next Step(s) (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: XHR and sandboxed iframes (was: Re: XHR without user credentials) (Thursday, 18 June)
• Re: XHR and sandboxed iframes (was: Re: XHR without user credentials) (Thursday, 18 June)
• Re: XHR and sandboxed iframes (was: Re: XHR without user credentials) (Thursday, 18 June)
• Re: XHR and sandboxed iframes (was: Re: XHR without user credentials) (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: XHR and sandboxed iframes (was: Re: XHR without user credentials) (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: XHR and sandboxed iframes (was: Re: XHR without user credentials) (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: XHR and sandboxed iframes (was: Re: XHR without user credentials) (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: [cors] Review (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: XHR and sandboxed iframes (was: Re: XHR without user credentials) (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: XHR without user credentials (Tuesday, 16 June)
• Re: [cors] origin and redirects (Tuesday, 16 June)
• Re: XHR without user credentials (Saturday, 13 June)
• Re: XHR without user credentials (Friday, 12 June)
• Re: Origin enables XSS to escalate to XSRF (was: security issue with XMLHttpRequest API compatibility) (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Re: XHR without user credentials (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Re: XHR without user credentials (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Re: XHR without user credentials (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: Origin enables XSS to escalate to XSRF (was: security issue with XMLHttpRequest API compatibility) (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: Origin enables XSS to escalate to XSRF (was: security issue with XMLHttpRequest API compatibility) (Sunday, 7 June)
• Re: Origin enables XSS to escalate to XSRF (was: security issue with XMLHttpRequest API compatibility) (Sunday, 7 June)
• Re: Origin enables XSS to escalate to XSRF (was: security issue with XMLHttpRequest API compatibility) (Sunday, 7 June)
• Re: Origin enables XSS to escalate to XSRF (was: security issue with XMLHttpRequest API compatibility) (Sunday, 7 June)
• Re: Origin enables XSS to escalate to XSRF (was: security issue with XMLHttpRequest API compatibility) (Sunday, 7 June)
• Re: Origin enables XSS to escalate to XSRF (was: security issue with XMLHttpRequest API compatibility) (Saturday, 6 June)
• Origin enables XSS to escalate to XSRF (was: security issue with XMLHttpRequest API compatibility) (Wednesday, 3 June)

Martin J. Dürst

• Re: Request for Comments: FPWD of Widgets 1.0: URI Scheme spec (Monday, 22 June)

Matt Womer

• Re: Restricting API access (Monday, 15 June)

Max Froumentin

• Re: review of A&E (Monday, 4 May)
• [webidl] Callback confusion (Wednesday, 29 April)
• Re: [webidl] definition of const string literal (Monday, 27 April)
• [webidl] definition of const string literal (Monday, 27 April)
• Re: review of A&E (Thursday, 23 April)
• review of A&E (Thursday, 16 April)

Michael A. Puls II

• Re: [XHR] XMLHttpRequest name (Tuesday, 23 June)
• Re: Input events, checkboxes and radio buttons (Sunday, 21 June)
• Re: Using xhr with file:// (Sunday, 19 April)
• Using xhr with file:// (Thursday, 16 April)

Michael Glavassevich

• Re: [ElementTraversal]: Feature string for DOMImplementation.hasFeature(feature, version)? (Tuesday, 2 June)

Michael(tm) Smith

• Re: [WebStorage] Property enumeration and checking presence (Tuesday, 30 June)
• Re: [WebStorage] Property enumeration and checking presence (Tuesday, 30 June)
• Re: Points of order on this WG (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: [cors] TAG request concerning CORS & Next Step(s) (Wednesday, 24 June)
• dev.w3.org CVS access [was: Why I don't attend the weekly teleconference] (Wednesday, 24 June)
• "W3C and APIs" writeup from TAG members (Thursday, 18 June)
• July 2008 f2f meeting minutes now publicly accessible (Thursday, 18 June)
• Discussions with HTTP WG about Origin header [was: Do we need to rename the Origin header?] (Wednesday, 8 April)

Mike Wilson

• RE: [cors] Web application (Tuesday, 16 June)
• RE: [cors] Web application (Monday, 15 June)
• RE: [cors] Web application (Monday, 15 June)
• RE: CSRF: alternative solutions (Monday, 8 June)
• RE: [DOM3Events] Use cases for Mutation Events (Friday, 5 June)
• RE: [DOML3Events] ACTION-267 Proposal for event iterator (Tuesday, 28 April)
• RE: [DOML3Events] ACTION-267 Proposal for event iterator (Saturday, 25 April)

mozer

• Re: Request for Comments: FPWD of Widgets 1.0: URI Scheme spec (Friday, 19 June)
• Re: New draft of Widgets: Access Requests Policy (Saturday, 6 June)
• Re: Mutation events replacement (Thursday, 4 June)
• Re: Mutation events replacement (Thursday, 4 June)
• Re: Widget instances and widget invocations (Thursday, 30 April)

Nikunj Mehta

• Re: Proposal for addition to WebStorage (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: Proposal for addition to WebStorage (Monday, 27 April)
• Re: Proposal for addition to WebStorage (Friday, 24 April)
• Re: Web Storage & SQL (Friday, 24 April)
• Proposal for addition to WebStorage (Friday, 24 April)
• Re: Web Storage Scope and Charter (Friday, 24 April)
• Re: Web Storage Scope and Charter (Friday, 24 April)
• Re: Web Storage Scope and Charter (Friday, 24 April)
• Re: Web Storage Scope and Charter (Friday, 24 April)
• Re: Web Storage Scope and Charter (was: CfC: FPWD of Server-Sent Events, Web Sockets API, Web Storage, and Web Workers; deadline April 10) (Friday, 24 April)
• Re: Web Storage Scope and Charter (was: CfC: FPWD of Server-Sent Events, Web Sockets API, Web Storage, and Web Workers; deadline April 10) (Friday, 24 April)
• Re: CfC: FPWD of Server-Sent Events, Web Sockets API, Web Storage, and Web Workers; deadline April 10 (Wednesday, 22 April)
• Re: CfC: FPWD of Server-Sent Events, Web Sockets API, Web Storage, and Web Workers; deadline April 10 (Tuesday, 21 April)
• Re: Web Storage & SQL (Tuesday, 14 April)
• Re: Web Storage & SQL (Saturday, 11 April)
• Re: Web Storage & SQL (Friday, 10 April)
• Re: CfC: FPWD of Server-Sent Events, Web Sockets API, Web Storage, and Web Workers; deadline April 10 (Friday, 10 April)
• Re: CfC: FPWD of Server-Sent Events, Web Sockets API, Web Storage, and Web Workers; deadline April 10 (Friday, 10 April)
• Re: CfC: FPWD of Server-Sent Events, Web Sockets API, Web Storage, and Web Workers; deadline April 10 (Friday, 10 April)
• Re: Web Storage & SQL (Thursday, 9 April)
• Re: Web Storage & SQL (Thursday, 9 April)
• Re: Web Storage & SQL (Thursday, 9 April)

Nikunj R. Mehta

• Re: [WebStorage] Property enumeration and checking presence (Tuesday, 30 June)
• Re: [WebStorage] Property enumeration and checking presence (Tuesday, 30 June)
• [WebStorage] Property enumeration and checking presence (Monday, 29 June)
• Re: Points of order on this WG (Saturday, 27 June)
• Re: Points of order on this WG (Saturday, 27 June)
• Re: Berkeley DB license (was Re: Points of order on this WG) (Friday, 26 June)
• Re: Berkeley DB license (was Re: Points of order on this WG) (Friday, 26 June)
• Re: Points of order on this WG (Friday, 26 June)
• Berkeley DB license (was Re: Points of order on this WG) (Friday, 26 June)
• Re: Points of order on this WG (Friday, 26 June)
• Re: Berkeley DB (was: Points of order on this WG) (Friday, 26 June)
• Re: Points of order on this WG (Friday, 26 June)
• Re: Points of order on this WG (Friday, 26 June)
• Re: Points of order on this WG (Friday, 26 June)
• Re: Points of order on this WG (Friday, 26 June)
• Re: Points of order on this WG (Friday, 26 June)
• Re: Points of order on this WG (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: Points of order on this WG (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: Points of order on this WG (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: Points of order on this WG (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: Points of order on this WG (Thursday, 25 June)
• Points of order on this WG (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: dev.w3.org CVS access [was: Why I don't attend the weekly teleconference] (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: Why I don't attend the weekly teleconference (Was: Input on the agenda) (Tuesday, 23 June)

noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

• Re: Dated URI for "Widgets 1.0: URI Scheme" seems to be broken (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Dated URI for "Widgets 1.0: URI Scheme" seems to be broken (Wednesday, 17 June)

Ojan Vafai

• Re: File API Feedback (Friday, 19 June)

Oliver Hunt

• Re: Handling too few arguments in method calls (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: [webidl] DOMString (Wednesday, 22 April)
• Re: [webidl] DOMString (Wednesday, 22 April)
• Re: [webidl] DOMString (Wednesday, 22 April)
• Re: [webidl] DOMString (Tuesday, 21 April)

Olli Pettay

• Re: File API Feedback (Tuesday, 30 June)
• Re: File API Feedback (Tuesday, 30 June)
• Re: File API Feedback (Tuesday, 30 June)
• Touch and gestures events (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: [webstorage] inactive documents (Monday, 27 April)
• Re: [webstorage] inactive documents (Monday, 27 April)

Per Fröjdh

• FW: Patent licensing and avoiding late Exclusions of Essential Claims in the WebApps WG (Thursday, 7 May)

Peter-Paul Koch

• Re: 'scroll' and 'resize' events (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Introduction: Peter-Paul Koch (Wednesday, 27 May)

Phillips, Addison

• I18N proposals document review... (Thursday, 30 April)
• RE: Widgets 1.0 Packaging and Configuration: I18N comments... (Friday, 3 April)
• RE: Widgets 1.0 Packaging and Configuration: I18N comments... (Friday, 3 April)

Priestley, Mark, VF-Group

• Leaving WebApps (was RE: [widgets] Draft Agenda for 25 June 2009 Voice Conference) (Wednesday, 24 June)
• RE: [widgets] Moving Widgets 1.0: Digital Signature spec to Candidate Recommendation (Thursday, 4 June)
• RE: Reminder: Comments for LCWD of Widgets 1.0: Digital Signatures due June 1 (Thursday, 4 June)
• RE: [widget-digsig] Updated Widget Signature editors draft (Friday, 24 April)
• RE: [widget-digsig] Pls review: Additional considerations on elliptic curve algorithms to consider (Thursday, 23 April)
• RE: [widget-digsig] Pls review: Additional considerations on elliptic curve algorithms to consider (Thursday, 23 April)
• RE: [widgets] New WD of Widgets 1.0: Digital Signatures spec published on March 31 (Thursday, 23 April)
• RE: Proposal for ISSUE-83 (Thursday, 23 April)
• RE: [widgets] New WD of Widgets 1.0: Digital Signatures spec published on March 31 (Wednesday, 22 April)
• RE: [widget] [widget-digsig] Comment on WD of Widgets 1.0: Digital Signatures - use of Created property (Wednesday, 22 April)
• RE: [widgets] dropping screenshot (Saturday, 18 April)
• RE: [Widgets A&E] Removing show() and hide() (Thursday, 16 April)
• [widget] [widget-digsig] Comment on WD of Widgets 1.0: Digital Signatures - use of Created property (Wednesday, 15 April)
• RE: ISSUE-83 (digsig should not be read at runtime): Instantiated widget should not be able to read digital signature [Widgets] (Thursday, 9 April)
• RE: [widgets] New WD of Widgets 1.0: Digital Signatures spec published on March 31 (Tuesday, 7 April)
• RE: [widgets] New WD of Widgets 1.0: Digital Signatures spec published on March 31 (Tuesday, 7 April)
• RE: ISSUE-83 (digsig should not be read at runtime): Instantiated widget should not be able to read digital signature [Widgets] (Thursday, 2 April)
• RE: ISSUE-83 (digsig should not be read at runtime): Instantiated widget should not be able to read digital signature [Widgets] (Thursday, 2 April)

Rigo Wenning

• Public call for prior art on Widget updates (Friday, 12 June)

Robert Sayre

• Re: Web IDL syntax (Tuesday, 30 June)
• Re: Web Storage & SQL (Saturday, 11 April)
• Re: Discussions with HTTP WG about Origin header [was: Do we need to rename the Origin header?] (Wednesday, 8 April)

Robin Berjon

• Re: Widgets PAG seeks feedback on Widget Updates spec (Monday, 29 June)
• A+E todo (Monday, 29 June)
• Re: Specs using Web IDL (Sunday, 28 June)
• Re: Points of order on this WG (Saturday, 27 June)
• Re: Points of order on this WG (Friday, 26 June)
• Re: Points of order on this WG (Friday, 26 June)
• AppCache to Widget Converter (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: [widgets] [preference element] question on the value attribute (Wednesday, 24 June)
• Re: [widgets] [preference element] question on the value attribute (Tuesday, 23 June)
• Re: [XHR] XMLHttpRequest name (Tuesday, 23 June)
• Re: [widgets] Please include a statement of purpose and user interaction expectations for <feature> (Tuesday, 23 June)
• Re: Web IDL syntax (Tuesday, 23 June)
• Re: Handling too few arguments in method calls (Tuesday, 23 June)
• Re: [selectors-api] Transitioning to CR (Friday, 19 June)
• Re: [selectors-api] Transitioning to CR (Friday, 19 June)
• Re: Web IDL syntax (Friday, 19 June)
• Re: File API Feedback (Friday, 19 June)
• Re: File API Feedback (Friday, 19 June)
• Re: File API, Editor's Draft II (Friday, 19 June)
• Re: [selectors-api] Transitioning to CR (Friday, 19 June)
• Re: File API, Editor's Draft II (Tuesday, 16 June)
• Re: [widgets] Public keys in widgets URI scheme? (Tuesday, 16 June)
• Re: [widgets] Public keys in widgets URI scheme? (Tuesday, 16 June)
• Re: [widgets] Widgets URI scheme... it's baaaack! (Monday, 15 June)
• Re: Review of widget access request (Monday, 15 June)
• Re: New draft of Widgets: Access Requests Policy (Monday, 15 June)
• New draft of Widgets: Access Requests Policy (Friday, 5 June)
• Re: Mutation events replacement (Friday, 5 June)
• Re: Mutation events replacement (Thursday, 4 June)
• Re: [DOM3Events] Use cases for Mutation Events (Thursday, 4 June)
• Re: Mutation events replacement (Thursday, 4 June)
• Attempt at consensus on the <access> model (Wednesday, 3 June)
• Re: [widgets] Please include a statement of purpose and user interaction expectations for <feature> (Tuesday, 2 June)
• Re: [widgets] P&C Last Call comments, interoperability (Tuesday, 2 June)
• Re: [widgets] P&C Last Call comments, versioning (Tuesday, 2 June)
• Re: [widgets] P&C Last Call comments, 4 (Tuesday, 2 June)
• More complete draft for Widgets: Access Requests (Wednesday, 20 May)
• Re: FPWD for WAR? (Wednesday, 20 May)
• FPWD for WAR? (Wednesday, 20 May)
• Re: [widget] Security model (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: [widgets] Agenda for 14 May 2009 Voice Conference (Wednesday, 13 May)
• Re: [widgets] Call for Additional Editor(s) for P&C spec (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: ACTION-337: Review of access element (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: [widgets] Comments to <access> element text (Thursday, 30 April)
• Widget instances and widget invocations (Thursday, 30 April)
• Re: [widgets] Draft Agenda for 30 April 2009 Voice Conference (Thursday, 30 April)
• Re: [widgets] Draft Agenda for 30 April 2009 Voice Conference (Thursday, 30 April)
• Widget URI ED (Wednesday, 29 April)
• Preferences for the I18N model (Wednesday, 29 April)
• I18N issue: case-sensitivity of locale subdirectories (Wednesday, 29 April)
• Re: review of A&E (Friday, 24 April)
• Re: review of A&E (Thursday, 23 April)
• agenda request: security considerations for access (Wednesday, 22 April)
• Re: Simple approach for <access> (Sunday, 19 April)
• Re: Simple approach for <access> (Sunday, 19 April)
• Re: [widgets] Jar signing vs. XML signatures (Friday, 17 April)
• Re: [widgets] Jar signing vs. XML signatures (Friday, 17 April)
• Re: [widgets] Jar signing vs. XML signatures (Friday, 17 April)
• Re: [widgets] dropping Asynchronous HTTP Requests and Storage (Tuesday, 7 April)
• Re: [widgets] dropping Asynchronous HTTP Requests and Storage (Tuesday, 7 April)
• Re: [widgets] remove update related methods form A&E (Monday, 6 April)
• Re: CfC: FPWD of Server-Sent Events, Web Sockets API, Web Storage, and Web Workers; deadline April 10 (Sunday, 5 April)

Sam Weinig

• Re: [webidl] XMLHttpRequest interface object (Thursday, 30 April)

Scott Shattuck

• Re: Web Storage & SQL (Thursday, 9 April)
• Re: [cors] security issue with XMLHttpRequest API compatibility (Monday, 6 April)

Scott Wilson

• Re: [widgets] [preference element] question on the value attribute (Wednesday, 24 June)
• Re: [widgets] Draft Minutes from 10 June 2009 f2f meeting (Friday, 12 June)
• Re: [widgets] What does it mean to have an unavailable API (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Re: [widgets] Implementing Google Wave with W3C Widgets (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: Storage and widgets (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: [widgets] What does it mean to have an unavailable API (Thursday, 4 June)
• Re: [widgets] What does it mean to have an unavailable API (Thursday, 4 June)
• Re: [widgets] P&C Last Call comments, viewmodes, referencing other specs, guarantee of consistency (Wednesday, 3 June)
• Re: [widgets] What does it mean to have an unavailable API (Tuesday, 2 June)
• Re: [widgets] What does it mean to have an unavailable API (Tuesday, 2 June)
• [widgets] Implementing Google Wave with W3C Widgets (Sunday, 31 May)
• [widgets] A&E test widget (Friday, 29 May)
• Re: [widgets] Draft Agenda for 28 May 2009 Voice Conference (Wednesday, 27 May)
• [widgets] Access Requests Use Case: Restricted access to remote web services using white/black lists (Friday, 22 May)
• Re: [widgets] Call for Input: Use Cases and Requirements for Widgets Access Request spec (Friday, 22 May)
• Re: Widget instances and widget invocations (Friday, 1 May)
• Re: Storage and widgets (Saturday, 25 April)
• Re: Storage and widgets (Friday, 24 April)
• Re: Simple approach for <access> (Thursday, 16 April)
• Re: New Widgets A&E Editors Draft (Thursday, 16 April)
• Re: [widgets] dropping Asynchronous HTTP Requests and Storage (Tuesday, 7 April)
• Re: [widgets] dropping Asynchronous HTTP Requests and Storage (Monday, 6 April)
• Re: [widgets] dropping Asynchronous HTTP Requests and Storage (Monday, 6 April)
• Re: [widgets] dropping Asynchronous HTTP Requests and Storage (Monday, 6 April)

Sean Hogan

• Re: Storage 'length' and enumeration (Thursday, 30 April)
• Re: Storage 'length' and enumeration (Thursday, 30 April)
• Re: Storage 'length' and enumeration (Wednesday, 29 April)
• Re: Storage 'length' and enumeration (Wednesday, 29 April)

Serge van den Boom

• Rationale for using a relational database with SQL (Thursday, 18 June)

Sergey Ilinsky

• Re: [DOM3Events] Use cases for Mutation Events (Thursday, 4 June)
• [DOM3Events] Use cases for Mutation Events (Thursday, 4 June)
• [DOML3Events] keydown repeatedness (Wednesday, 27 May)

Shawn Wilsher

• Re: Web Storage & SQL (Friday, 10 April)

Shiki Okasaka

• Re: Web IDL syntax (Tuesday, 23 June)
• Re: [WebIDL] On overloaded operations in an effective overload set (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: [WebIDL] On overloaded operations in an effective overload set (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: [webidl] definition of const string literal (Tuesday, 28 April)

Sigbjorn Finne

• [widgets] <access> element processing (Saturday, 9 May)

Simon Pieters

• Re: Handling too few arguments in method calls (Monday, 22 June)

Stefan Håkansson LK

• Re: FW: Patent licensing and avoiding late Exclusions of Essential Claims in the WebApps WG (Thursday, 4 June)

Sullivan, Bryan

• RE: [widgets] Comments to <access> element text (Tuesday, 5 May)
• RE: [widgets] Comments to <access> element text (Friday, 1 May)
• RE: [widgets] Comments to <access> element text (Friday, 1 May)
• [widgets] Comments to <access> element text (Thursday, 30 April)
• June F2F (Wednesday, 15 April)

SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (ATTCINW)

• Questions on A&E spec (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Response to ACTION-348 (Tuesday, 9 June)

Thomas Broyer

• Re: File API Feedback (Tuesday, 30 June)
• Re: CSRF: alternative solutions (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: [XHR] Authorization header (Wednesday, 1 April)

Thomas Roessler

• Review of widget access request (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Re: Widgets 1.0: Digital Signatures (Thursday, 4 June)
• Re: [widgets] Public keys in widgets URI scheme? (Wednesday, 27 May)
• Re: [widgets] Public keys in widgets URI scheme? (Wednesday, 27 May)
• Re: [widgets] Widgets URI scheme... it's baaaack! (Wednesday, 27 May)
• Re: [widgets] Widgets URI scheme... it's baaaack! (Wednesday, 27 May)
• Re: [widgets] Widgets URI scheme... it's baaaack! (Wednesday, 27 May)
• Re: [widgets] Widgets URI scheme... it's baaaack! (Monday, 25 May)
• Re: More complete draft for Widgets: Access Requests (Thursday, 21 May)
• Re: FPWD for WAR? (Wednesday, 20 May)
• Re: [widget] Security model (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: [widgets] Agenda for 14 May 2009 Voice Conference (Wednesday, 13 May)
• Re: ACTION-337: Review of access element (Friday, 8 May)
• Re: [widgets] dig sig and requirements ready for pub! (Monday, 4 May)
• Re: [widgets] dig sig and requirements ready for pub! (Monday, 4 May)
• Re: [widgets] dig sig and requirements ready for pub! (Monday, 4 May)
• ACTION-337: Review of access element (Saturday, 2 May)
• Re: Widget URI ED (Wednesday, 29 April)
• Re: [widgets] Dig Sig review in prep for LC (Wednesday, 29 April)
• Re: [widgets] Dig Sig review in prep for LC (Wednesday, 29 April)
• Re: [widgets] Identifying all security related issues with "core" Widgets specs (Tuesday, 28 April)
• Re: Storage and widgets (Saturday, 25 April)
• Re: Storage and widgets (Friday, 24 April)
• Re: Storage and widgets (Friday, 24 April)
• Re: Storage and widgets (Friday, 24 April)
• Storage and widgets (Thursday, 23 April)
• Re: Simple approach for <access> (Monday, 20 April)
• Widgets unconference at WWW 2009 (Thursday, 16 April)
• Re: Simple approach for <access> (Thursday, 16 April)
• Re: [widgets] Jar signing vs. XML signatures (Wednesday, 15 April)
• Re: [widgets] Jar signing vs. XML signatures (Tuesday, 14 April)
• FYI: chartering discussion re security policy for APIs (Tuesday, 14 April)
• Re: [cors] security issue with XMLHttpRequest API compatibility (Tuesday, 14 April)
• Re: [widgets] Jar signing vs. XML signatures (Tuesday, 14 April)
• Re: [widgets] Jar signing vs. XML signatures (Tuesday, 14 April)
• Re: Discussions with HTTP WG about Origin header [was: Do we need to rename the Origin header?] (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: [cors] security issue with XMLHttpRequest API compatibility (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header? (Monday, 6 April)

timeless

• Re: http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/#reserved-file-and-folder-names (Tuesday, 30 June)
• Re: [widgets] Please include a statement of purpose and user interaction expectations for <feature> (Tuesday, 23 June)
• Re: File API Feedback (Friday, 19 June)
• widgets spec (Thursday, 18 June)
• widgets feedback (Thursday, 18 June)
• widgets feedback (Thursday, 18 June)
• widgets feedback (Thursday, 18 June)
• widgets feedback (Thursday, 18 June)
• Fwd: Chat with Marcos Caceres (Thursday, 18 June)
• File API - W3C Working Draft 7 June 2009 (Sunday, 14 June)
• Re: Widgets 1.0: Digital Signatures (Thursday, 4 June)
• Widgets 1.0: Digital Signatures (Thursday, 4 June)
• Re: [widgets] Draft Agenda for 28 May 2009 Voice Conference (Wednesday, 27 May)
• Re: [widgets] Widgets URI scheme... it's baaaack! (Wednesday, 27 May)
• Re: [widgets] Widgets URI scheme... it's baaaack! (Wednesday, 27 May)
• Re: [widget] Security model (Sunday, 24 May)
• Re: Storage 'length' and enumeration (Thursday, 30 April)
• Re: [webidl] definition of const string literal (Wednesday, 29 April)
• Re: [DOML3Events] ACTION-267 Proposal for event iterator (Wednesday, 29 April)
• Re: [widgets] Jar signing vs. XML signatures (Tuesday, 14 April)
• Re: Widgets 1.0 Packaging and Configuration: I18N comments... (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: [widgets] New WD of Widgets 1.0: Digital Signatures spec published on March 31 (Tuesday, 7 April)

Travis Leithead

• [DOM L3] Telecon today? (Wednesday, 27 May)
• RE: Next steps for XHR L1 spec? (Monday, 4 May)
• RE: [DOML3Events] ACTION-267 Proposal for event iterator (Tuesday, 28 April)
• [DOM3Events] Regards for teleconference of 4/1/2009 (Wednesday, 1 April)

Tyler Close

• Re: XHR and sandboxed iframes (was: Re: XHR without user credentials) (Friday, 26 June)
• Re: XHR and sandboxed iframes (was: Re: XHR without user credentials) (Friday, 26 June)
• Re: [cors] TAG request concerning CORS & Next Step(s) (Wednesday, 24 June)
• Re: [cors] TAG request concerning CORS & Next Step(s) (Wednesday, 24 June)
• Re: [cors] TAG request concerning CORS & Next Step(s) (Wednesday, 24 June)
• Re: [cors] Review (Tuesday, 23 June)
• Re: [cors] Review (Monday, 22 June)
• Re: [cors] Review (Monday, 22 June)
• Re: [cors] Review (Monday, 22 June)
• Re: [cors] Review (Monday, 22 June)
• Re: [cors] Review (Thursday, 18 June)
• Re: [cors] Review (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: [cors] Review (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: [cors] Review (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: [cors] Review (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: [cors] Review (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: [cors] Review (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: [cors] Review (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: XHR without user credentials (Saturday, 13 June)
• Re: XHR without user credentials (Saturday, 13 June)
• Re: XHR without user credentials (Saturday, 13 June)
• Re: XHR without user credentials (Saturday, 13 June)
• Re: Redirect and Origin (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Re: Redirect and Origin (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Re: Redirect and Origin (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Redirect and Origin (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Re: XHR without user credentials (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Re: XHR without user credentials (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Re: XHR without user credentials (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Re: XHR without user credentials (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Re: XHR without user credentials (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Re: XHR without user credentials (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Re: XHR without user credentials (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: [cors] Review (Monday, 8 June)
• XHR without user credentials (Was: Origin enables XSS to escalate to XSRF (was: security issue with XMLHttpRequest API compatibility)) (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: [cors] security issue with XMLHttpRequest API compatibility (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: [cors] security issue with XMLHttpRequest API compatibility (Tuesday, 7 April)
• Re: [cors] security issue with XMLHttpRequest API compatibility (Tuesday, 7 April)
• Re: [cors] security issue with XMLHttpRequest API compatibility (Tuesday, 7 April)
• Re: [cors] security issue with XMLHttpRequest API compatibility (Monday, 6 April)
• Re: [cors] security issue with XMLHttpRequest API compatibility (Monday, 6 April)
• Re: [cors] security issue with XMLHttpRequest API compatibility (Monday, 6 April)
• [cors] security issue with XMLHttpRequest API compatibility (Monday, 6 April)

Vladimir Vukicevic

• Web Storage & SQL (Wednesday, 8 April)

Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker

• ISSUE-91: Origin and redirects [CORS] (Tuesday, 16 June)
• ISSUE-90: Exposing more (~infinite) response headers [CORS] (Tuesday, 16 June)
• ISSUE-89: Reduce the length of the header names? [CORS] (Sunday, 14 June)

William Edney

• Re: 'scroll' and 'resize' events (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: [widgets] Widgets URI scheme... it's baaaack! (Friday, 22 May)
• CORS for file-based web apps (Sunday, 5 April)

Yves Savourel

• RE: [widgets] i18n proposals document (Friday, 17 April)
• RE: [widgets] i18n proposals document (Friday, 17 April)

Zhiheng Wang

• Window atttributes for timing info (Monday, 15 June)

~:'' ありがとうございました。

• two-player game application (Friday, 17 April)

Last message date: Tuesday, 30 June 2009 23:52:19 UTC