- From: Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 20:34:04 +0200
- To: Scott Wilson <scott.bradley.wilson@gmail.com>
- Cc: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>, Arve Bersvendsen <arveb@opera.com>, public-webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
2009/4/25 Scott Wilson <scott.bradley.wilson@gmail.com>: > I think perhaps the underlying assumptions may vary according to the type of UA? > > However, I think even on a single-user O/S (e.g. mobile) or in a sandboxed user context you would still want to maintain storage of preferences on a per-instance basis. > I agree. I think the common use case will be to have per instance storage. A question that arises is: what happens if the window object already provides storage? Should I use the widget storage or the window's storage. I personally think that they should be the same object (i.e., widget.preference just references whatever the Window storage object is... I don't have the spec Web Storage spec handy, so I can't remember what it is called (window.storage?)). Kind regards, Marcos -- Marcos Caceres http://datadriven.com.au
Received on Monday, 8 June 2009 18:34:45 UTC