- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:11:30 -0700
- To: Joćo Eiras <joaoe@opera.com>
- Cc: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Olli Pettay <Olli.Pettay@helsinki.fi> wrote: > On 4/27/09 11:43 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote: >> >> IIRC we do something similar with pages that have >> listeners for 'beforeclose' listeners. > > You mean 'beforeunload', and gecko does the same thing when page has > listeners for 'unload' . Yes, thanks. On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Joćo Eiras <joaoe@opera.com> wrote: > >> Either we simply ask implementations to not cache windows with >> 'storage' listeners. > > That would be bad for perceived performance and usability. Indeed, do you have any alternative solutions that would produce a better result? My concern is that Annes proposal would result in buggy pages. IMHO it's better that a page is reloaded form network (or http cache) than that we revive a broken page. / Jonas
Received on Tuesday, 28 April 2009 20:12:24 UTC