Re: [widgets] dig sig and requirements ready for pub!

On 4 May 2009, at 16:13, Frederick Hirsch wrote:

> The Identifier property is useful for audit and management in the  
> backend.  I believe this should remain in the specification and  
> should remain a normative section, agreeing with Thomas note in the  
> chat. It was added based on requirements from WG members.
>
> Thomas mentioned in the chat the means to obtain unique values, e.g.  
> large random number, serial number + DNS  etc, but I think this can  
> be out of scope of the spec.

+1 to out of scope; my argument was as a proof of existence only.

Received on Monday, 4 May 2009 14:18:39 UTC