- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 13:39:53 +0200
- To: public-webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <D254AC40-D949-4FF2-A58B-B4076FDBF3C8@w3.org>
FYI, the message below just went to the public-device-apis@w3.org list. Please follow up there. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2009Apr/ Regards, -- Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org> Begin forwarded message: > From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org> > Date: 14 April 2009 13:34:12 GMT+02:00 > To: public-device-apis@w3.org > Subject: Starting the chartering discussion -- security policy for > APIs > > Hello, > > it's about time that we start a chartering discussion. Fundamentals > that we need to sort out in order to get from here to there: > > - general scope of the work (and things that are out of scope) > - basic principles for the work > - deliverables and milestones > - resources > - input documents > > Based on the outcomes from the workshop [1] and the notes from the > mobile web breakout session at the AC meeting [2], I'd propose the > following in terms of a (rough) mission and scope, and would > appreciate your feed-back on this mailing list: > > 1. The group would be chartered to produce a framework for the > expression of security policies that govern access of Web > applications and widgets to security-critical APIs. To achieve this > goal, the group will need to deal with the following items: > > - policy expression proper > - identification of APIs > - identification of web applications and Widgets > > 2. Out of scope: > > - concrete APIs > - policy management and discovery > - fundamental changes to JavaScript > > 3. Principles: > > - before inventing a new policy expression language, existing > languages (such as XACML) should be reviewed for suitability > - the resulting policy model must be compatible with the existing > same origin policy (as documented in the HTML5 specification) > - the work should not be specific to either mobile or desktop > environments, but may take differences between the environments into > account > > 4. Liaisons: > > - PLING (W3C Policy Languages Interest Group) > - HTML WG > - WebApps WG > - geolocation WG > - Mobile Web Best Practices WG > - BONDI > - OpenAjaxAlliance > > Note that this would be a good time for interested members to > indicate *privately* whether they're willing to make chairing or > editing resources available. > > This would also be a good time for those members who presented > concrete technical proposals at the workshop to indicate whether > they'll be interested in putting these proposals on the table as a > basis for the work proposed here. > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2008/security-ws/report > [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-archive/2009Apr/0094.html > > Note: [2] is member-only; I'll circulate a publicly visible summary > some time soon. > > -- > Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org> >
Received on Tuesday, 14 April 2009 11:40:05 UTC