W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2009

RE: ISSUE-83 (digsig should not be read at runtime): Instantiated widget should not be able to read digital signature [Widgets]

From: Priestley, Mark, VF-Group <Mark.Priestley@vodafone.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 23:20:17 +0200
Message-ID: <0BE18111593D8A419BE79891F6C4690902C17276@EITO-MBX01.internal.vodafone.com>
To: "Arthur Barstow" <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Cc: "Web Applications Working Group WG" <public-webapps@w3.org>
Hi Art, All,

I tracked down my original explanation with subsequent qualification

The problem in a nutshell is that by allowing multiple signatures, which
is something we want to do, we create a situation in which not all of a
signed widget's files are covered by the signature. This is fine if the
parts that aren't signed can not be "used" by the widget. My suggestion
was that the contents of the signature files were simply made
unavailable to the widget at runtime. To me this seemed like a straight
forward solution to mitigating the threat. However I understand that
there have been comments that there may be cases in which a widget might
want to read the contents of it's own signature files.  

So while I don't want to divert attention away from more important
discussions, before we close this issue I would like to hear what the
requirement is for a widget to access it's own signatures? What are the
use cases. For example, I would like to understand whether it would be
enough for those use cases to only allow the widget access valid




>-----Original Message-----
>From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.barstow@nokia.com] 
>Sent: 05 March 2009 17:37
>To: Priestley, Mark, VF-Group
>Cc: Web Applications Working Group WG
>Subject: Re: ISSUE-83 (digsig should not be read at runtime): 
>Instantiated widget should not be able to read digital 
>signature [Widgets]
>Mark - during the March 5 widgets voice conference we 
>discussed this issue that you raised [1]. Marcos created this 
>issue from the following e-mail thread:
>  <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009JanMar/
>A couple of the people on the call asked for some more 
>information, in particular the specific threat scenario.
>We would appreciate it if you would please elaborate on your concern.
>-Regards, Art Barstow
>On Feb 22, 2009, at 11:53 AM, ext Web Applications Working 
>Group Issue Tracker wrote:
>> ISSUE-83 (digsig should not be read at runtime): Instantiated  
>> widget should not be able to read digital signature [Widgets]
>> http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/issues/83
>> Raised by: Mark Priestley
>> On product: Widgets
>> Need to mention somewhere that the digital signature must not be  
>> accessible by the start file once the widget is running.
Received on Thursday, 2 April 2009 21:21:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:12:53 UTC