Re: Web IDL syntax

On Fri, 19 Jun 2009 06:54:45 +0200, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> wrote:
> So if we are happy to extend the IDL syntax, I think any extended
> attribute that is intended to have some effect across all language
> bindings should be moved to the syntax proper.  Following are my half
> baked proposals.  I haven’t them through much; comments very much
> welcome.

In general this seems fine to me. As long as you help reviewing specifications that use Web IDL :-)


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/

Received on Friday, 19 June 2009 08:51:53 UTC