- From: Mike Wilson <mikewse@hotmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 23:54:36 +0200
- To: "'Anne van Kesteren'" <annevk@opera.com>, "'Mark Nottingham'" <mnot@yahoo-inc.com>
- Cc: "'WebApps WG'" <public-webapps@w3.org>
Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 20:54:22 +0200, Mike Wilson > <mikewse@hotmail.com> wrote: > > Anne van Kesteren wrote: > > > You said Web application has been traditionally used to refer > > > to server-side applications. Is there any reference for this? > > > It seems more logical to call those Web services to me. Also, > > > the name of this group suggests Web applications is pretty > > > much client-side so I'm thinking of simply removing > > > "client-side" within CORS. > > > > I think this suggestion breaks with well established terms in > > web application development. A short (and not very formal) > > summary of these terms could be something like: [...] > > I note you did not define Web application. Hm, I thought I did. I defined two types of web applications, client- side and server-side, both of which are web applications. I would expect the W3C webapps group to deal with both types, no? Note that, while the webapps group deals with browser ("client-side") technologies, these are used by both client-side and server-side web applications, although to different extents. > Wikipedia seems to > concur with me by the way (and the name of this WG): > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_application No, they actually don't. The article is mainly about server-side web applications with a few mentions about client-side webapps, not only about client-side webapps as you indicate. My other objection was about your suggestion "Web application has been traditionally used to refer to server- side applications. It seems more logical to call those Web services to me.". Check the wikipedia page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_service and you'll see that they agree with my definition and that these are not server-side web applications. Lastly, I had a look at the CORS spec and I agree that you should probably skip the use of "client-side web application". These are really just statistical measures, f ex current server-side webapps usually make use of some script for certain tasks, so saying "client- side" doesn't really define anything. If you want to make a point of that certain features require script then it is better to write that - "web applications using script" - or even "web sites or web applications using script" as CORS doesn't really limit itself just to webapps. Best regards Mike Wilson
Received on Monday, 15 June 2009 21:55:24 UTC