- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 01:43:10 -0700
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>, "Nikunj R. Mehta" <nikunj.mehta@oracle.com>, public-webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>, Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>, Jeff Mischkinsky <JEFF.MISCHKINSKY@oracle.com>
On Jun 26, 2009, at 12:23 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Fri, 26 Jun 2009 01:20:43 +0200, Maciej Stachowiak > <mjs@apple.com> wrote: >> I strongly agree on these points. I would prefer to see SQL Storage >> split out of the rest of Web Storage. We seem to have rough >> consensus and strong multilateral implementor interest on >> LocalStorage and SessionStorage, and they should be allowed to move >> forward on the standards track quickly. SQL Storage remains >> contentious, and only Apple and Google have shown strong >> implementor interest so far. And it has no technical tie to the >> other storage drafts. I also think Nikunj's proposal should be yet >> a third separate orthogonal draft. > > FWIW, Opera is implementing SQL storage too. That's great news! Having multiple independent implementations will, I hope, provide more reason to advance the spec. However, I still think SQL storage should be split from LocalStorage/ SessionStorage, since there is no technical reason for them to be tied together, and they enjoy different levels of consensus and implementor support. Regards, Maciej
Received on Friday, 26 June 2009 08:43:52 UTC