- From: Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 12:16:11 +0200
- To: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
- Cc: public-webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 4:16 PM, Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com> wrote: > Hi, > > the following issue has cropped up in the I18N model as described in the > excellent I18N document from Marcos[0]. > > Assume we have two localisation subdirectories: > > locales/en/ > locales/EN/ > > What happens? BCP47 (which we reference) is defined to be case-insensitive > so it doesn't help us much in this respect. > > There are multiple options: > > a) we define a canonical casing and all others are ignored; > b) we select an order of priority and we only consider one (the first to > match); > c) we select an order of priority and we merge them all (in that order, > with a given precedence rule); > d) the device on which the user agent is catches fire. > > I think that (a) should be ruled out because as BCP47 tells us, ISO639-1 > recommends lowercase (language codes), ISO3166-1 recommends uppercase > (country codes), and ISO15924 recommends titlecase (script codes). These are > different, but likely to be confusing, and I don't think that developers > should have to worry about that. Agreed. > I'd like to reject (d) as out of line with our design preferences. Awww... :( > I don't have a strong opinion on this, but I do I have a preference for a > rule based on (b): if multiple locale subdirectories have the same > case-insensitive name, then the one that comes first in ASCII-code order > (e.g. in order: EN, En, eN, en) is used and the others are ignored. This seems reasonable. I will add this. > The argument in favour of only using one is that we already have to merge > multiple directories, and adding one merge operation for what is in all > probability a user error seems like too much complexity for little value > (I'm happy to be contradicted by implementers however). Picking ASCII-code > order is based on the fact that the directory names must be ASCII here (the > others must be discarded), and picking the first is arbitrary. > > Thoughts? I support b. Added some of your text above to the spec. > > [0]http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/waf/widgets/i18n.html?rev=1.29&content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8 > > -- > Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ > Feel like hiring me? Go to http://robineko.com/ > > > > > > > -- Marcos Caceres http://datadriven.com.au
Received on Tuesday, 5 May 2009 10:17:14 UTC