- From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 02:54:34 +0200
- To: "Charles McCathieNevile" <chaals@opera.com>, "WebApps WG" <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Wed, 04 Mar 2009 12:00:44 +0200, Anopti mist <chaals@opera.com> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> It would appear that the Selectors API is done...
or nearly so.
> Since the call for consensus to produce a Candidate Recommendation
> following the Last Call and resolution of comments received, there has
> been one substantive change to the document - removing [Null] and
> [Undefined] extended attributes from IDL, added note about handling null
> and undefined. It seems that there is general agreement that this change
> does not materially impact the specification in practice, and we can
> therefore request Proposed Recommendation.
...
> This is a call for consensus on the question:
>
> ... the group should request Proposed Recommendation status for the
> Selectors API spec, based on the Editor's draft version 1.97[1]
This question did not receive sufficient support. We will therefore
publish a Candidate Recommendation.
cheers
Chaals
--
Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group
je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk
http://my.opera.com/chaals Try Opera: http://www.opera.com
Received on Wednesday, 15 April 2009 00:55:16 UTC