- From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 02:54:34 +0200
- To: "Charles McCathieNevile" <chaals@opera.com>, "WebApps WG" <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Wed, 04 Mar 2009 12:00:44 +0200, Anopti mist <chaals@opera.com> wrote: > Hi folks, > > It would appear that the Selectors API is done... or nearly so. > Since the call for consensus to produce a Candidate Recommendation > following the Last Call and resolution of comments received, there has > been one substantive change to the document - removing [Null] and > [Undefined] extended attributes from IDL, added note about handling null > and undefined. It seems that there is general agreement that this change > does not materially impact the specification in practice, and we can > therefore request Proposed Recommendation. ... > This is a call for consensus on the question: > > ... the group should request Proposed Recommendation status for the > Selectors API spec, based on the Editor's draft version 1.97[1] This question did not receive sufficient support. We will therefore publish a Candidate Recommendation. cheers Chaals -- Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk http://my.opera.com/chaals Try Opera: http://www.opera.com
Received on Wednesday, 15 April 2009 00:55:16 UTC