RE: [widgets] What does it mean to have an unavailable API

>>Ok, that makes sense; but I have serious doubts anyone will implement that.
Why?
You mean because it would not sell, because it is bad by design or any other reason?

Marcin Hanclik
ACCESS Systems Germany GmbH
Tel: +49-208-8290-6452  |  Fax: +49-208-8290-6465
Mobile: +49-163-8290-646
E-Mail: marcin.hanclik@access-company.com

-----Original Message-----
From: marcosscaceres@gmail.com [mailto:marcosscaceres@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Marcos Caceres
Sent: Monday, June 08, 2009 8:34 PM
To: Marcin Hanclik
Cc: Scott Wilson; Henri Sivonen; public-webapps
Subject: Re: [widgets] What does it mean to have an unavailable API

2009/6/3 Marcin Hanclik <Marcin.Hanclik@access-company.com>:
> Hi Scott,
>
>>>I can see the UC for requestFeature, though its not something we'd
>>>ever expect to use - we'd stick to just static feature declarations,
>>>as we have no way of injecting scripts into instances after they've
>>>already launched.
> There is an ongoing debate about requestFeature().
> BONDI spec is approaching both widgets and websites and basically requestFeature() is planned to be primarily used only by websites.
>

Ok, that makes sense; but I have serious doubts anyone will implement that.


--
Marcos Caceres
http://datadriven.com.au


________________________________________

Access Systems Germany GmbH
Essener Strasse 5  |  D-46047 Oberhausen
HRB 13548 Amtsgericht Duisburg
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Michel Piquemal, Tomonori Watanabe, Yusuke Kanda

www.access-company.com

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This e-mail and any attachments hereto may contain information that is privileged or confidential, and is intended for use only by the
individual or entity to which it is addressed. Any disclosure, copying or distribution of the information by anyone else is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this document in error, please notify us promptly by responding to this e-mail. Thank you.

Received on Tuesday, 9 June 2009 08:20:51 UTC