- From: Marcin Hanclik <Marcin.Hanclik@access-company.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 16:20:04 +0200
- To: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
>>Should there be no function object for >>frob()? Or should it be there but throw upon calling? Or something else. There should be no function object in that case. Marcin Hanclik ACCESS Systems Germany GmbH Tel: +49-208-8290-6452 | Fax: +49-208-8290-6465 Mobile: +49-163-8290-646 E-Mail: marcin.hanclik@access-company.com -----Original Message----- From: public-webapps-request@w3.org [mailto:public-webapps-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Henri Sivonen Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 2:52 PM To: public-webapps Subject: [widgets] What does it mean to have an unavailable API > > Ok. I see what you mean. Widget.hasFeature has slightly different > semantics (in widgets, it means "did that feature I requested load > and become available?" Which brings up the issue that it's unclear what it means for an API to have latent support but not having been activated with <feature>. If a widget UA has an implementation for window.frob() and frob() requires <feature> activation, what should happen when frob() hasn't been activated with <feature>? Should there be no function object for frob()? Or should it be there but throw upon calling? Or something else. Please specify this. -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/ ________________________________________ Access Systems Germany GmbH Essener Strasse 5 | D-46047 Oberhausen HRB 13548 Amtsgericht Duisburg Geschaeftsfuehrer: Michel Piquemal, Tomonori Watanabe, Yusuke Kanda www.access-company.com CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This e-mail and any attachments hereto may contain information that is privileged or confidential, and is intended for use only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. Any disclosure, copying or distribution of the information by anyone else is strictly prohibited. If you have received this document in error, please notify us promptly by responding to this e-mail. Thank you.
Received on Tuesday, 2 June 2009 14:21:02 UTC