- From: Frederick Hirsch <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 07:38:23 -0400
- To: "marcosc@opera.com" <marcosc@opera.com>
- Cc: Frederick Hirsch <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>, "Barstow Art (Nokia-CIC/Boston)" <Art.Barstow@nokia.com>, ext Kai Hendry <hendry@aplix.co.jp>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
I was aware of what you quoted Marcos, but it was implicit. If it is ok, then I'm not sure why we've been having this email thread... regards, Frederick Frederick Hirsch Nokia On May 5, 2009, at 6:38 AM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote: > On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Arthur Barstow > <Art.Barstow@nokia.com> wrote: >> On May 4, 2009, at 10:13 AM, Hirsch Frederick (Nokia-CIC/Boston) >> wrote: >> >>> We can add, "A signer MUST place the dsp:Identifier signature >>> property >>> into the signature when generating the signature." if necessary. >> >> This seems like a reasonable way to address Kai's question. > > that is already in the spec: > > "Each widget signature MUST contain a dsp:Identifier signature > properties element compliant with XML Signature Properties > [XMLDSIG-Properties] and this specification." > >> Kai - please let us know if Frederick's proposal is acceptable. >> > > > -- > Marcos Caceres > http://datadriven.com.au
Received on Tuesday, 5 May 2009 11:39:17 UTC