W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2009

Re: [webidl] definition of const string literal

From: timeless <timeless@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:21:22 +0300
Message-ID: <26b395e60904290121k2d768bcfm36f26ec118838aef@mail.gmail.com>
To: Shiki Okasaka <shiki@google.com>
Cc: WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> wrote:
> (Also I see that you’re using the “string” and “wstring”, and L"wide
> string" values.  Are you of the opinion that Web IDL should introduce
> those instead of DOMString?)

Shiki Okasaka <shiki@google.com> wrote:
> In my opinion, it would be nice if we can use the keyword 'string' as
> the same meaning of 'DOMString' in Web IDL since it's not only for DOM
> specifications.

this would be a serious problem for mozilla. In mozilla, 'string' and
'wstring' mean things very different from DOMString, and we can't
change that.
Received on Wednesday, 29 April 2009 08:36:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:12:53 UTC