- From: Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:27:03 +0200
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Anne van Kesteren<annevk@opera.com> wrote: > On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:20:25 +0200, Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Anne van Kesteren<annevk@opera.com> >> wrote: >>> "TO BE WRITTEN, PLEASE IGNORE" if normative material is yet to be >>> written you cannot enter Last Call. Per >>> http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#return-to-wg it >>> seems you have to publish this as Working Draft again. >> >> You are reviewing the (bleeding-edge) editor's draft, Anne. Not the >> published one. That is obviously not in the published draft [1], it's >> just something I put in there yesterday during the F2F and have not >> had a chance to finish yet... I will finish that bit tomorrow. >> Obviously, that won't be in the final draft. >> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets/ > > Oh ok. All the more reason the cited process document applies though, methinks. Understood and I see what you mean. I will continue editing and then let the chairs and team contacts decide if we need to republish or if we can proceed to CR. Is that OK? Kind regards, Marcos -- Marcos Caceres http://datadriven.com.au
Received on Tuesday, 30 June 2009 12:27:58 UTC