- From: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:15:31 +0200
- To: marcosc@opera.com
- Cc: public-webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Apr 24, 2009, at 11:12 , Marcos Caceres wrote:
>> Also note that a scheme doesn't necessarily uniquely map to a
>> protocol, so
>> it should probably say "scheme handler".
>
> Right. I thought the same thing. I used "protocol handler" to be
> consistent with HTML5.
Ah, well before we use different terminology we should have a chat
with someone who knows where that wording comes from in HTML5 and see
if there's a reason to keep it.
--
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/
Feel like hiring me? Go to http://robineko.com/
Received on Friday, 24 April 2009 09:16:07 UTC