- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@yahoo-inc.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 16:51:00 +1000
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
Anne, Might I suggest that it seems more logical because you work for a browser vendor, and are steeped in the client-side application world? A "Web service" means many different things to many different people (SOAP, WSDL, REST, etc.) and generally refers to an exposed API, not a web application. As far examples: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_application_framework http://www.scripting.com/davenet/2000/03/12/ whatIsAWebApplication.html http://www.webappsec.org/ http://java.sun.com/javaee/technologies/webapps/ ... and that's just from the first page of search results. Note that I'm not disputing that what's in-scope here *could* be called a Web Application -- just that it's a very broad and muddy term that may mislead people who come at this document from a different angle. Anyway, it was just a suggestion, not a big deal. Cheers, On 16/06/2009, at 3:05 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > Mark, > > You said Web application has been traditionally used to refer to > server-side applications. Is there any reference for this? It seems > more logical to call those Web services to me. Also, the name of > this group suggests Web applications is pretty much client-side so > I'm thinking of simply removing "client-side" within CORS. > > Cheers, > > > -- > Anne van Kesteren > http://annevankesteren.nl/ -- Mark Nottingham mnot@yahoo-inc.com
Received on Wednesday, 17 June 2009 06:53:13 UTC