- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 14:01:42 +0200
- To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Cc: ext Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>, public-webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
On 21 May 2009, at 03:32, Arthur Barstow wrote: > One of the problems that at least Arve, Thomas and others have > raised, is the lack of clear use case(s) and requirements. I think > that information should be included in the FPWD. It would not only > help the group work through the details of the model but would also > help others understand the rationale and design of the model. Indeed. It'll be important to have a clear description of what the spec is supposed to achieve. That will also help to get proper review of the specificaton, both by the upcoming Deice API WG and externally. > Given BONDI has done some related security work, perhaps they have > use case and requirements that can be used/leveraged.
Received on Thursday, 21 May 2009 12:06:34 UTC