W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2009

RE: Feature names: Typo in example

From: Marcin Hanclik <Marcin.Hanclik@access-company.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:22:16 +0200
To: "marcosc@opera.com" <marcosc@opera.com>
CC: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-ID: <FAA1D89C5BAF1142A74AF116630A9F2C2890AF7DA5@OBEEX01.obe.access-company.com>
Hi Marcos,

I am ok with the response.
Thanks a lot!

Kind regards,

Marcin Hanclik
ACCESS Systems Germany GmbH
Tel: +49-208-8290-6452  |  Fax: +49-208-8290-6465
Mobile: +49-163-8290-646
E-Mail: marcin.hanclik@access-company.com

-----Original Message-----
From: marcosscaceres@gmail.com [mailto:marcosscaceres@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Marcos Caceres
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 11:27 AM
To: Marcin Hanclik
Cc: public-webapps
Subject: Re: Feature names: Typo in example

Hi Marcin,
For the LC DoC, can I get a quick confirmation that you are satisfied
with the responses of the WG for this thread.

Kind regards,

On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Marcos Caceres<marcosc@opera.com> wrote:
> For the sake of the disposition of comment, please verify that you are
> satisfied with the changes and response below.
> On 5/29/09 4:55 PM, Marcin Hanclik wrote:
>> Hi Marcos,
>> Thanks.
>> Your proposal is generally ok me, feature name is just IRI.
>> I have, however, 2 arguments to change your proposal a bit:
>> 1. "API:" may be misunderstood, so let's use e.g. "http:" or "ftp:" or
>> anything else what is universally known (and hierarchical at the same time)
>> now.
>> 2. To satisfy the comments from Christian, I would add at least one slash
>> in the IRI, e.g.
>> "http://example.org/geolocation"
>> As you know in BONDI (just informatively now) we went further and the
>> query part of the IRI is used for versioning of the APIs as in
>> http://bondi.omtp.org/1.0/apis/BONDI_Interface_Patterns_v1.0.html#versioning.

>> I do not want to discuss versioning here, but I just would like to vote
>> for a slash in the IRI example, to show that IRI is more powerful than just
>> to be used as a string (I mean hierarchy etc. and slash may just help here).
>> What do you think?
> Right, but we don't want delude people into believing that it serves any
> purpose beyond helping humans see the hierarchy. How and implementation
> treats the URI is a matter for the implementation (in the case of BONDI,
> hierarchy indicated by slashes instead of dots might be significant, or it
> might not... I don't know.).
> Having said that, I've changed it to a slash to avoid any further confusion.
> Kind regards,
> Marcos

Marcos Caceres


Access Systems Germany GmbH
Essener Strasse 5  |  D-46047 Oberhausen
HRB 13548 Amtsgericht Duisburg
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Michel Piquemal, Tomonori Watanabe, Yusuke Kanda


This e-mail and any attachments hereto may contain information that is privileged or confidential, and is intended for use only by the
individual or entity to which it is addressed. Any disclosure, copying or distribution of the information by anyone else is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this document in error, please notify us promptly by responding to this e-mail. Thank you.
Received on Monday, 29 June 2009 12:26:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:12:54 UTC