FPWD for WAR?

Hi all,

I'd like us to agree to a plan to get WAR to FPWD as soon as possible.  
I would suggest the following that we build on the document that  
Marcos has already put up[0], add an extended version of the SM  
processing that Thomas discussed on this list[1], and note the points  
on which there is disagreement. With that, go to FPWD.

Then I would like the plan to be that we call for discussion here on  
the disagreement, and try to resolve them.

Thoughts? Removing this has had messy ripple effects — it would be  
nice to address the issue quickly.


[0] http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-access/
[1] http://www.w3.org/mid/8273305F-C0A4-465F-83E4-90020C2122C3@w3.org

-- 
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/
     Feel like hiring me? Go to http://robineko.com/

Received on Wednesday, 20 May 2009 08:29:36 UTC