- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 11:49:07 +0200
- To: "Maciej Stachowiak" <mjs@apple.com>
- Cc: "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>, "Doug Schepers" <schepers@w3.org>, "Nikunj R. Mehta" <nikunj.mehta@oracle.com>, "public-webapps WG" <public-webapps@w3.org>, "Charles McCathieNevile" <chaals@opera.com>, "Arthur Barstow" <art.barstow@nokia.com>, "Jeff Mischkinsky" <JEFF.MISCHKINSKY@oracle.com>
On Fri, 26 Jun 2009 10:43:10 +0200, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> wrote: > On Jun 26, 2009, at 12:23 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> FWIW, Opera is implementing SQL storage too. > > That's great news! Having multiple independent implementations will, I > hope, provide more reason to advance the spec. > > However, I still think SQL storage should be split from LocalStorage/ > SessionStorage, since there is no technical reason for them to be tied > together, and they enjoy different levels of consensus and implementor > support. Yeah, that seems fine. That way localStorage/sessionStorage can move ahead while Web SQL is properly defined. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Friday, 26 June 2009 09:50:11 UTC