- From: Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 11:33:52 +0200
- To: Andrew Sledd <Andrew.Sledd@ikivo.com>
- Cc: public-webapps@w3.org
Hi Andy, On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Andrew Sledd <Andrew.Sledd@ikivo.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > > I need confirmation that I understand the impact of F1 from the “Finding > missing localized content”, specifically how the dynamic setting of the > xml:base on the element influences subsequent localized content resolving, > so please review my understanding and correct me if I have got it wrong. > > > > Is the expectation that the dynamically set xml:base is limited to the > element itself and not recursively applied to all other resource resolution? > That is, the dynamically set xml:base does not override the “base-folder” > determined by the ua and widget locale matching. From the example (see > excerpt from proposal below), the xml:base would be resolved to the widget > root for the content element, but not impact the resource resolving for the > elements in the index.htm file which reference the a.gif and the b.gif > files. These would resolve to the locale/en-us-xx/ locale. Would their > xml:base be expected to dynamically be set accordingly? As there is no more notion of a base folder, and we no longer use xml:base, then non of the above applies. However, it would be great to get your thoughts on what is now in the spec. Kind regards, Marcos -- Marcos Caceres http://datadriven.com.au
Received on Friday, 22 May 2009 09:34:54 UTC